2020
DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of chromosome 1q duplication in parental and genome‐edited human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived neural stem cells results in their higher proliferation rate in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(154 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although excitatory neurons and inhibitory neurons are traditionally thought to arise from distinct pools of precursor cells originating from different regions of the developing brain [ 15 ], the presence of chr1q gain in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (as well as astrocytes) in our patient is in line with the recent finding that a subset of cortical progenitor cells can potentially give rise to both excitatory and inhibitory neurons during human brain development [ 16 ]. The hypothesis that chr1q gain occurred in a cortical progenitor cell during neurodevelopment would also be consistent with in vitro data showing that chr1q gain confers a proliferative advantage in neural stem cells [ 17 ]. Lastly, the existence of a subpopulation markedly enriched in chr1q-gained cells in excitatory neurons (Exc.s6) but not inhibitory neurons suggests that migration defects may be more pronounced in excitatory neurons compared to inhibitory neurons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although excitatory neurons and inhibitory neurons are traditionally thought to arise from distinct pools of precursor cells originating from different regions of the developing brain [ 15 ], the presence of chr1q gain in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (as well as astrocytes) in our patient is in line with the recent finding that a subset of cortical progenitor cells can potentially give rise to both excitatory and inhibitory neurons during human brain development [ 16 ]. The hypothesis that chr1q gain occurred in a cortical progenitor cell during neurodevelopment would also be consistent with in vitro data showing that chr1q gain confers a proliferative advantage in neural stem cells [ 17 ]. Lastly, the existence of a subpopulation markedly enriched in chr1q-gained cells in excitatory neurons (Exc.s6) but not inhibitory neurons suggests that migration defects may be more pronounced in excitatory neurons compared to inhibitory neurons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, no alterations on these chromosomes were found within this work using OGM. However, a duplication on chromosome 1q, which was previously reported in gene-edited hiPSCs [ 33 , 44 , 74 ], ESCs [ 20 , 33 , 65 , 66 , 74 ], and derivatives [ 75 , 76 ], was detected in the PS1-LMNB1_GFP cell line. This genetic modification has been associated with an increase in proliferation rate [ 75 ], potentially due to AKT3 overexpression [ 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, a duplication on chromosome 1q, which was previously reported in gene-edited hiPSCs [ 33 , 44 , 74 ], ESCs [ 20 , 33 , 65 , 66 , 74 ], and derivatives [ 75 , 76 ], was detected in the PS1-LMNB1_GFP cell line. This genetic modification has been associated with an increase in proliferation rate [ 75 ], potentially due to AKT3 overexpression [ 77 ]. Strikingly, within this study, no increase in the proliferation rate was detectable in PS1-LMNB1_GFP hiPSCs harboring the 1q duplication ( Figure 1 b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We support the second possibility for the following reasons: 1) it has been shown in many literatures that the presence of extra chromosome has a negative impact of cell fitness in vivo and in vitro [ 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 ]; 2) we confirmed that disomic cells become majority over the passages in mixed cell culture ( S3 Fig ); and 3) non-disjunction leading to chromosomal trisomy is the most reported karyotypic change in cultured human iPSCs [ 16 ] . In this study, we identified iPSC clones with chromosome numerical abnormalities, such as trisomies 1, 6, 11, 20, and XXY and monosomies 4, 10, and 13, and the most prevalent chromosome numerical abnormality was trisomy 1, where genes involved in cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation are present [ 17 , 18 ] . Moreover, trisomy 20 was reported to show a selective growth advantage by inhibiting apoptosis with the BCL2L1 gene as a driver [ 19 ] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%