2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.04.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition and reversal of visual discrimination learning in APPSwDI/Nos2−/− (CVN) mice

Abstract: Studies of cognitive behavior in rodent models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are the mainstay of academic and industrial efforts to find effective treatments for this disorder. However, in the majority of such studies, the nature of rodent behavioral tests is considerably different from the setting associated with cognitive assessments of individuals with AD. The recently developed touchscreen technique provides a more translational way of rodent cognitive testing because the stimulus (images in different locati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-sample t -test was used to assess the difference of the group mean from a theoretical value. In our previous study (Piiponniemi et al, 2017 ) we noticed that within-session reaction times and reward collection latencies were right-skewed even after log10 or square root transformations. Therefore, for between-genotype comparisons, session median rather than session mean values of these parameters from individual mice were used, because they were more robust to the effect of outliers and more representative as central tendency measures for each session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One-sample t -test was used to assess the difference of the group mean from a theoretical value. In our previous study (Piiponniemi et al, 2017 ) we noticed that within-session reaction times and reward collection latencies were right-skewed even after log10 or square root transformations. Therefore, for between-genotype comparisons, session median rather than session mean values of these parameters from individual mice were used, because they were more robust to the effect of outliers and more representative as central tendency measures for each session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, a previous study reported significantly improved performance in TgCRND8 (4.5-months of age) mice during the reversal phase [24]. By contrast, APPSwDl/Nos2 −/− (4-5 months of age) and APPS1-21 (6 months of age) mice exhibited impaired performance in the reversal learning task [53,54]. Medial prefrontal cortex lesions facilitate reversal learning in mice [55], whereas lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex impair reversal learning [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Data was acquired with Abet II software. Dependent variables were total number of sessions, % correct (correction trials not included), and perseveration index PI, with PI = correction trials / incorrect trials (Brigman et al, 2008;Piiponniemi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Visual Discrimination and Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%