2017
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquiring research‐grade ERPs on a shoestring budget: A comparison of a modified Emotiv and commercial SynAmps EEG system

Abstract: This study compared the performance of a low-cost wireless EEG system to a research-grade EEG system on an auditory oddball task designed to elicit N200 and P300 ERP components. Participants were 15 healthy adults (6 female) aged between 19 and 40 (M = 28.56; SD = 6.38). An auditory oddball task was presented comprising 1,200 presentations of a standard tone interspersed by 300 trials comprising a deviant tone. EEG was simultaneously recorded from a modified Emotiv EPOC and a NeuroScan SynAmps RT EEG system. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, the EPOC was reworked as described elsewhere (Debener, Minow, Emkes, Gandras, & de Vos, 2012) and attached to an EasyCap with 13 Ag/AgCl ring electrodes (EASYCAP, Etterschlag, Germany). Previous studies have provided evidence for the satisfactory data quality of the reworked EPOC (Barham et al, 2017; EEG acquisition according to the International 10-20 system (AFz, Fz, F3, F4, FCz, Cz, C3, C4, Pz, PO7, PO8), two electrodes were used as right eye and right ear lobe electrode, respectively, and one pin was reserved for marker input. Common mode sense (CMS) was at position POz and driven right leg (DRL) at CPz.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the EPOC was reworked as described elsewhere (Debener, Minow, Emkes, Gandras, & de Vos, 2012) and attached to an EasyCap with 13 Ag/AgCl ring electrodes (EASYCAP, Etterschlag, Germany). Previous studies have provided evidence for the satisfactory data quality of the reworked EPOC (Barham et al, 2017; EEG acquisition according to the International 10-20 system (AFz, Fz, F3, F4, FCz, Cz, C3, C4, Pz, PO7, PO8), two electrodes were used as right eye and right ear lobe electrode, respectively, and one pin was reserved for marker input. Common mode sense (CMS) was at position POz and driven right leg (DRL) at CPz.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is also low in cost compared with medical-grade systems, and is wireless and portable, allowing its use outside of the laboratory (e.g., in homes or schools). Although the EPOC+ system has been validated against research grade systems for recording early ERPs, such as auditory ERPs (Badcock et al, , 2013Barham et al, 2017), and face-sensitive N170 (de Lissa et al, 2015), studies on later components such as the P300 have yielded less consistent results. Vos et al (2014) report similar performance of the Emotiv amplifier compared to a research-grade amplifier, and Elsawy et al (2014) found acceptable results when using a classifier on P300 EPOC+ data, while Duvinage et al (2013) report that the EPOC+ recorded a significantly noisier signal compared to the research grade ANT system (Advanced Neuro Technology, ANT, Enschede, The Netherlands).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison studies revealed that the Emotiv system (equipped with the cheap original electrodes) performs less accurate than a medical device, however is able to record EEG data in a satisfying manner (Duvinage et al, 2013; Badcock et al, 2013). Comparing a modified (according to Debener et al, 2012) Emotiv System with a commercial SynAmps System revealed only small differences, with a marginal worse performance of the modified Emotiv System (Barham et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%