2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12055-022-01345-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquired tracheo-esophageal fistula in adult—a classical case of ‘what not to do’

Abstract: Acquired tracheo-esophageal fistulas (TEFs) are challenging. The most common causes are prolonged intubation, malignancy, and trauma whereas granulomatous infections like tuberculosis are rare. Endoscopic intervention with esophageal or tracheal stenting or clipping is of unproven benefit in the management of such lesions, where surgical repair is almost invariably required. We report a case of a 32-year-old man, with a case of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. He had no history of malignancy or trau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our patient with tubercular fistulas did not have clinical features of aspiration, probably because despite having multiple fistulas, the fistulous openings were smaller (less than 5 mm). Therefore, it was decided that the patient did not require primary defect closure with the help of clip, stent etc., either endoscopically or surgically, as is often described in available literature [ 6 , 9 , 10 ]. Endoscopic or surgical correction became necessary if the size of the defect is large (more than 5 mm) or patient has recurrent infection or sepsis because of aspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient with tubercular fistulas did not have clinical features of aspiration, probably because despite having multiple fistulas, the fistulous openings were smaller (less than 5 mm). Therefore, it was decided that the patient did not require primary defect closure with the help of clip, stent etc., either endoscopically or surgically, as is often described in available literature [ 6 , 9 , 10 ]. Endoscopic or surgical correction became necessary if the size of the defect is large (more than 5 mm) or patient has recurrent infection or sepsis because of aspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%