ACP-based social computing and parallel intelligence: Societies 5.0 and beyond

Wang, Xiao; Li, Lingxi; Yuan, Yong; Ye, Peijun; Wang, Fei‐Yue

doi:10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.005

Cited by 65 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Likewise, Zhuge (2010, p. 1) argued that, "With the rapid development of information technology, the cyber space is connecting physical space, social space and mental space to form a new world-Cyber Physical Society". Such notions of "cyber-physical society" might be seen as conceptual forebears of the Society 5.0 paradigm that has now been developed within Japan-as well as of the similar concept of "Societies 5.0" that has been formulated independently by Wang et al (2016) and Wang et al (2018) in a manner that also builds on the concept of cyber-physical-social systems but is not directly related to the Japanese Society 5.0 paradigm. Ferreira and Serpa (2018) make the link between cyber-physical systems and Society 5.0 explicit when they highlight Medina-Borja's assertion that the "new realm" of Society 5.0 will encompass a "cyber-physical world" that functions almost symbiotically alongside "the human world" (Medina-Borja 2017, p. 235).…”

Section: Society 50 S Dependence On Transformative Future Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies

Gladden

2019

Social Sciences

175

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Government of Japan’s “Society 5.0” initiative aims to create a cyber-physical society in which (among other things) citizens’ daily lives will be enhanced through increasingly close collaboration with artificially intelligent systems. However, an apparent paradox lies at the heart of efforts to create a more “human-centered” society in which human beings will live alongside a proliferating array of increasingly autonomous social robots and embodied AI. This study seeks to investigate the presumed human-centeredness of Society 5.0 by comparing its makeup with that of earlier societies. By distinguishing “technological” and “non-technological” processes of posthumanization and applying a phenomenological anthropological model, this study demonstrates: (1) how the diverse types of human and non-human members expected to participate in Society 5.0 differ qualitatively from one another; (2) how the dynamics that will shape the membership of Society 5.0 can be conceptualized; and (3) how the anticipated membership of Society 5.0 differs from that of Societies 1.0 through 4.0. This study describes six categories of prospective human and non-human members of Society 5.0 and shows that all six have analogues in earlier societies, which suggests that social scientific analysis of past societies may shed unexpected light on the nature of Society 5.0.

show abstract

Section: Society 50 S Dependence On Transformative Future Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies

Gladden

2019

Social Sciences

175

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Wang, Yuan, Yong, Wang, Xiao, and Qin (2018) and Wang, Li, Yuan, Ye, and Wang (2016) indicate that the concept of Society 5.0 emerged in 2015 in Japan (Abreu, 2018), in a strategic national political initiative (Keidanren, 2016;Harayama, 2017; Center for Research and Development Strategy: Japan Science and Technology Agency, 2017). For Prasetyo and Arman (2017) and Costa (2018), Society 5.0 follows, to some extent, Industry 4.0, and, while Industry 4.0 focuses on production, Society 5.0 seeks to put humans at the centre of innovation.…”

Section: Society 50mentioning

confidence: 99%

Society 5.0 and Social Development: Contributions to a Discussion

Ferreira

Serpa²

2018

MOS

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This opinion article intends to address the emergence of what will, potentially, be a central concept in a very near future, that of Society 5.0, and that emerges politically as a (con)sequence of the implementation of the concept of Industry 4.0. By proposing a deepening of the potential of the individual-technology relationship in fostering the improvement of the quality of life of all people through a super-intelligent society, Society 5.0 is an extremely recent concept as a guide for social development and that can have a profound impact on societies at all levels, such as in terms of the quality of life and sustainability. This presentation is based on very recent publications, but it also has a prospective component, which always generates some indeterminacy and uncertainty. Also for this reason, this contribution seeks, above all, to help in this very urgent and necessary discussion. Keywords: society 5.0; industry 4.0; social development; sustainable innovation 2. Industry 4.0 Industry 4.0 is very often regarded as somehow a fourth industrial revolution due to the profound effects it brings

show abstract

“…Several improved versions of this idea have been proposed to solve the problem (Jan a cek & Buzna, 2008;Ji, Tang, Li, Yang, & Liao, 2016; Mladenovi c, Brimberg, Hansen, & Moreno-P erez, 2007). Other popular methods include local search (Brimberg, Drezner, Mladenovi c, & Salhi, 2014), tabu search (Wang, Li, Yuan, Ye, & Wang, 2016b), neighbourhood search (Qazi, Lam, Xiao, Ouyang, & Yin, 2016), etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre

Pamučar

Tarle

Parezanović

2018

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper describes the application of a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, MultiAtributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA), used to select a location for the development of a multimodal logistics centre by the Danube River. The MAIRCA method is based on the comparison of theoretical and empirical alternative ratings. Relying on theoretical and empirical ratings the gap (distance) between the empirical and ideal alternative is defined. To determine the weight coefficients of the criteria, the DEMATEL method was applied. In this paper, through a sensitivity analysis, the results of MAIRCA and other MCDM methods -MOORA, TOPSIS, ELECTRE, COPRAS and PROMETHEEwere compared. The analysis showed that a smaller or bigger instability in alternative rankings appears in MOORA, TOPSIS, ELECTRE and COPRAS. On the other hand, the analysis showed that MAIRCA and PROMETHEE offer consistent solutions and have a stable and wellstructured analytical framework for ranking the alternatives. By presenting a new method MCDM expands the theoretical framework of expertise in the field of MCDM. This enables the analysis of practical problems with new methodology and creates a basis for further theoretical and practical upgrade.

show abstract

ACP-based social computing and parallel intelligence: Societies 5.0 and beyond

Cited by 65 publications

References 25 publications

Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies

Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies

Society 5.0 and Social Development: Contributions to a Discussion

New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About