1980
DOI: 10.1121/1.384454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustics of gas-bearing sediments. II. Measurements and models

Abstract: Acoustical properties of water saturated and gassy sediments are observed to be significantly different. The present state of knowledge of the acoustical properties of saturated sediments, gassy water, and gassy sediments is reviewed in a companion paper. The dynamics of bubbles in water and in various solid materials, including sediments, are experimentally examined here. Pulsation resonance is exhibited by the bubbles in all materials examined. Predictions of bubble resonance frequency and damping are shown … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk of the dispersion occurs between the 1-kHz and 3-kHz data sets; the 3-, 5-, and 7-kHz data sets all tend to have similar velocities. The observed dispersion does not fit the theoretical models of Anderson and Hampton (1980b); this discrepancy is believed to be caused by experimental error.…”
Section: Velocity Tomographymentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The bulk of the dispersion occurs between the 1-kHz and 3-kHz data sets; the 3-, 5-, and 7-kHz data sets all tend to have similar velocities. The observed dispersion does not fit the theoretical models of Anderson and Hampton (1980b); this discrepancy is believed to be caused by experimental error.…”
Section: Velocity Tomographymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Empirical relationships between the dynamic frame bulk modulus and sediment porosity (Hamilton, 1971) and the dynamic rigidity modulus and grain size (Anderson and Hampton, 1980b) were used to determine values for these moduli (Kd.15 dyn/cm2 and W . 2 5 dyn/cm2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations