1970
DOI: 10.1121/1.1912304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustical Beam Patterns for Bats: Some Theoretical Considerations

Abstract: Acoustical beam patterns for emission from several different bats are calculated assuming a piston source in an infinite baffle, both as single and as double emitters. The calculated beam patterns agree well enough with experimental values available in the literature to justify the assumptions used. For those bats which possess no facial appendages to serve as a baffle, the simple acoustical model does not work, as anticipated. The calculated beam patterns are for fixed frequencies in the examples used; howeve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interference between the emission from each nostril is apparently used to direct sound in the horizontal dimension (Hartley and Suthers, 1987). These results are similar to those for other species of bats in which the role of the noseleaf was studied (e.g., Megaderma and Rhinolophus; Möhres and Neuwiler, 1966;Strother and Mogus, 1970;Sokolov and Makarov, 1971;Schnitzler and Grinnell, 1977). Although other features of the noseleaf and horseshoe have not been studied in relation to their affect on echolocation pulses, it seems likely that these characters influence some aspects of pulse emissions.…”
Section: Evolution Of Facial Features: a Phylogenetic Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Interference between the emission from each nostril is apparently used to direct sound in the horizontal dimension (Hartley and Suthers, 1987). These results are similar to those for other species of bats in which the role of the noseleaf was studied (e.g., Megaderma and Rhinolophus; Möhres and Neuwiler, 1966;Strother and Mogus, 1970;Sokolov and Makarov, 1971;Schnitzler and Grinnell, 1977). Although other features of the noseleaf and horseshoe have not been studied in relation to their affect on echolocation pulses, it seems likely that these characters influence some aspects of pulse emissions.…”
Section: Evolution Of Facial Features: a Phylogenetic Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…5B). Assuming a constant emitter size, 5.9 mm as reported by Jakobsen and Surlykke (2010) for Eptesicus serotinus, similar to E. fuscus, we estimated the beam width using a piston model (Strother and Mogus, 1970). As the bats approached the first net opening, they decreased end frequency of the FM sweep from 26.2 to 23.4 kHz, which, according to the model, would increase the half-amplitude angle of their sonar beam by 10 deg, from 51 to 61 deg.…”
Section: Duration Adjustments and Inner Window With Respect To Net Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the horizontal radiation pattern in H. terasensis, as well as in other bats with nostril emitters, follows basic principles of combining simple sources. In several bats that emit echolocation through the nostrils, their nostril separations are known to be nearly equal to one-half the wavelength of the CF 2 frequency [6]. H. terasensis also has a nostril separation with a half wavelength of the CF 2 frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CF 3 , there was a sharp drop in the amplitude at 50 degrees in contrast to CF 2 . When the pulse is emitted through two nostrils as in Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, the radiation pattern can be estimated by considering a combination of simple sources placed closely enough so that interference occurs [6]. The estimated pattern is given by PðÞ ¼ 20 log cos…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation