2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1063771010060035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic spectroscopy of fluid saturation effects in carbonate rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly different version of this algorithm [ Tufts and Kumaresan , ] was applied successfully for the first time by Lebedev and his colleagues in the context of RUS, to synthetic data with Q ~ 50 [ Lebedev , ] and to experimental data with Q ranging from about 50 to 350 [ Lebedev et al , , ]. The same technique was used later on an isotropic sample of carbonate rock where the Q ‐factor was varied from Q ~ 1000 in a vacuum down to Q ~ 40 when fully saturated [ Averbakh et al , ]. In a similar fashion, RUS was applied to sedimentary and metamorphic rock samples with Q ‐factors as low as 20 [ Lebedev et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly different version of this algorithm [ Tufts and Kumaresan , ] was applied successfully for the first time by Lebedev and his colleagues in the context of RUS, to synthetic data with Q ~ 50 [ Lebedev , ] and to experimental data with Q ranging from about 50 to 350 [ Lebedev et al , , ]. The same technique was used later on an isotropic sample of carbonate rock where the Q ‐factor was varied from Q ~ 1000 in a vacuum down to Q ~ 40 when fully saturated [ Averbakh et al , ]. In a similar fashion, RUS was applied to sedimentary and metamorphic rock samples with Q ‐factors as low as 20 [ Lebedev et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 (see also [25]) shows the physical config uration of the experimental setup. The letters "R" and "S" mark the oscillation receiver and the excitation power source, respectively.…”
Section: Measurement Of Acousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excitation frequency varied with the step, which was ten times smaller than the expected width of the resonance max imum (the Q factor of oscillations did not exceed 200 for all specimens) to resolve the overlapping resonance lines [29]. To eliminate effects related to the influence of fluid vapor and condensate inside the specimens (e.g., [25]), the measurements were performed in a rarefied atmosphere at the pressure of ~20 Pa. Simple estimates show that the fluid inside the specimens at such pressure could have existed only in a bound state, the thickness of the adsorption film being about 5 Å.…”
Section: Measurement Of Acousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential has two minima with separation distances and and a barrier with for some ion concentrations and electric potentials. Rock, concrete and other porous materials widely used in industry contain a sufficient amount of fluid and ions between the grains even in room conditions to be trustworthy recorded in elastic moduli (e.g., the results of accurate measurements in [40]). Therefore, the potential ( 5) is a good approximation for better understanding of slow and fast time processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%