2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic sensors for snowdrift measurements: How should they be used for research purposes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In-situ instruments are prone to extreme weather conditions, and measurement errors increase with wind speed (Cierco et al, 2007). Remote-sensed observations of drifting snow, shown to be promising on Antarctica (Palm et al, 2011), are limited on Greenland due to enhanced cloudiness and generally shallower drifting snow layers (S. P. Palm, personal communication, 2011).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ instruments are prone to extreme weather conditions, and measurement errors increase with wind speed (Cierco et al, 2007). Remote-sensed observations of drifting snow, shown to be promising on Antarctica (Palm et al, 2011), are limited on Greenland due to enhanced cloudiness and generally shallower drifting snow layers (S. P. Palm, personal communication, 2011).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FlowCapt is described in detail in Chritin et al (1999) and Cierco et al (2007). It consists of a hollow tube fitted with electroacoustic transducers.…”
Section: Instruments and Test Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overestimation of one order of magnitude was also noted by Savelyev et al (2006) for a comparison with nets in the Arctic. Cierco et al (2007) proposed a new calibration of the instrument as the result of his own intercomparison with nets in a wind tunnel (with corn cobs and sand) and in the field (with snow) in the French Alps showing substantial flux overestimation. The second-generation instrument has never been evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations