Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2666633.2666635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment and Rapport in Collaborative Learning Dialogues

Abstract: In spoken dialogue analysis, the speech signal is a rich source of information. We explore in this paper how low level features of the speech signal, such as pitch, loudness, and speaking rate, can inform a model of student interaction in collaborative learning dialogues. For instance, can we observe the way that two people's manners of speaking change over time to model something like rapport? By detecting interaction qualities such as rapport, we can better support collaborative interactions, which have been… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have demonstrated the utility of these types of data as a means of convergent triangulation in correlating non-verbal elements with learning gains. Other co-located computer-based, CPS studies using the MMLA approach have included verbal data in the analysis, but these studies focus not on the semantic meaning of the utterances, rather they focus on prosodic elements (pitch, tone), duration of speaking time and/or turn-taking to help interpret group functioning (Lubold & Pon-Barry, 2014, Praharaj, Scheffel, Drachsler, & Specht, 2018. While all of these studies are important and are contributing to our understanding of body language and turn taking in colocated, computer-based, CPS, none of them are seeking to use learning analytics to semantically analyze human dialogue.…”
Section: Learning Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have demonstrated the utility of these types of data as a means of convergent triangulation in correlating non-verbal elements with learning gains. Other co-located computer-based, CPS studies using the MMLA approach have included verbal data in the analysis, but these studies focus not on the semantic meaning of the utterances, rather they focus on prosodic elements (pitch, tone), duration of speaking time and/or turn-taking to help interpret group functioning (Lubold & Pon-Barry, 2014, Praharaj, Scheffel, Drachsler, & Specht, 2018. While all of these studies are important and are contributing to our understanding of body language and turn taking in colocated, computer-based, CPS, none of them are seeking to use learning analytics to semantically analyze human dialogue.…”
Section: Learning Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrainment was found to occur in more interactively oriented scenarios and is generally regarded as a phenomenon conveying collaboration or rapport [25]. In a previous study, [20], [21] found pitch synchrony in speed dating dialogues both on a global level across conversations as well as on a local level within conversations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The intensity feature was included for comparison purposes with previous local acoustic-prosodic entrainment measures. The parameters used to extract the intensity feature are described in [19].…”
Section: Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%