2020
DOI: 10.3765/ptu.v5i1.4796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic properties of word and phrasal prominence in Uzbek

Abstract: Based on a large-scale corpus of experimental data produced by 8 native speakers of Tashkent Uzbek, we assess the presence of canonical word-final stress in real words spoken in three dialogue types: without focus, with contrastive focus, and with new information focus on the target. The first context provides baseline information regarding the manifestation of stress, in the absence of additional focus properties. By comparing the latter two contexts with the former, we are also able to assess the acoustic ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, φs exhibit longer final syllables than ωs do. No significant durational difference is found between the final and the unstressed penultimate syllable in finally stressed words (Vogel et al 2016;Athanasopoulou et al 2021). Linguistic pauses are longer between two ιs than between two φs.…”
Section: Prosodic Structure Theory As Applied To Turkishmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, φs exhibit longer final syllables than ωs do. No significant durational difference is found between the final and the unstressed penultimate syllable in finally stressed words (Vogel et al 2016;Athanasopoulou et al 2021). Linguistic pauses are longer between two ιs than between two φs.…”
Section: Prosodic Structure Theory As Applied To Turkishmentioning
confidence: 77%