2015
DOI: 10.1075/atoh.14.11vog
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitation of this phenomenon to word-initial position, however, suggests that "tonogenesis" is not the appropriate characterization of the change at this point, if a tonal language is one that exhibits tone contrasts in different positions throughout a word. Instead, what may be emerging is a restrictive type of lexical stress system with prominence predictably on the first syllable (i.e., asin Hungarian, where the primary cue is also F0 (Vogel, Athanasopoulou and Pincus 2015)). Nevertheless, the Korean system is also not yet a full-fledged stress system since we found no evidence of enhancement of the prosodic properties of the first (or any other) syllable under focus, as would be expected on the stressed syllable of a word in a stress language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limitation of this phenomenon to word-initial position, however, suggests that "tonogenesis" is not the appropriate characterization of the change at this point, if a tonal language is one that exhibits tone contrasts in different positions throughout a word. Instead, what may be emerging is a restrictive type of lexical stress system with prominence predictably on the first syllable (i.e., asin Hungarian, where the primary cue is also F0 (Vogel, Athanasopoulou and Pincus 2015)). Nevertheless, the Korean system is also not yet a full-fledged stress system since we found no evidence of enhancement of the prosodic properties of the first (or any other) syllable under focus, as would be expected on the stressed syllable of a word in a stress language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each target vowel, duration, intensity, F0 (mean and contour) and vowel centralization were measured and Z-normalized for vowel and speaker intrinsic differences. The data were analysed statistically with Binary Logistic Regression(see Vogel, Athanasopoulou and Pincus 2015). We also measured the VOT of the onset stops for two speakers to verify previous claims that the VOT distinction is being lost.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performed by Genzel et al (2015) and Vogel et al (2015). The phonetic cue that is most likely to be associated with prominence in Hungarian appears to be the scaling of F0 peaks of falling accents.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The authors found results consistent with what they refer to as an extended version of the FLH: Hungarian, the language of the four with contrastive vowel length, was found not to use duration as a cue to stress (see also Vogel et al . 2015), and Greek and Spanish were found to use different cues for word-level stress (F0, in both cases) and sentence-level focus (duration, in both cases). This kind of careful experimental investigation is what is needed to ultimately assess the validity of the FLH across languages, as well as to understand more broadly what types of cues remain distinct.…”
Section: The Functional Load Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 96%