2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic properties of modified wood under different humid conditions and their relevance for musical instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, information on EMC dependence of vibrational properties of wood was identified within 26 references, ranging from the 1940s to recent years. As a general trend, it appears that the earlier references address both the between-species diversity and the multi-physical (moisture, temperature, frequency) dependence of vibrational behaviour (Fukada 1951;Greenhill 1942;James 1961;Kollmann and Krech 1960;Matsumoto 1962;Pentoney 1955;Sellevold et al 1975;Suzuki 1962Suzuki , 1980, while the later references tend to have a primary focus on how moisture content and vibrational properties are affected by wood modification (Ahmed and Adamopoulos 2018;Akitsu et al 1993;Kubojima et al 2000;Matsunaga et al 2000;Obataya et al 2000aObataya et al , 2001Sedighi Gilani et al 2014;Yano and Minato 1992;Yano et al 1986). This, of course, is only a general historical trend, and physical-mechanical behaviour and/or natural variability are still found as a main focus of studies on EMC-vibrational properties from the past 3 decades (Hunt 1997;Kubojima et al 2005a;Jiang et al 2012;Inokuchi et al 1999;Obataya and Norimoto 1995;Obataya et al 1998;Sasaki et al 1988;Viala 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, information on EMC dependence of vibrational properties of wood was identified within 26 references, ranging from the 1940s to recent years. As a general trend, it appears that the earlier references address both the between-species diversity and the multi-physical (moisture, temperature, frequency) dependence of vibrational behaviour (Fukada 1951;Greenhill 1942;James 1961;Kollmann and Krech 1960;Matsumoto 1962;Pentoney 1955;Sellevold et al 1975;Suzuki 1962Suzuki , 1980, while the later references tend to have a primary focus on how moisture content and vibrational properties are affected by wood modification (Ahmed and Adamopoulos 2018;Akitsu et al 1993;Kubojima et al 2000;Matsunaga et al 2000;Obataya et al 2000aObataya et al , 2001Sedighi Gilani et al 2014;Yano and Minato 1992;Yano et al 1986). This, of course, is only a general historical trend, and physical-mechanical behaviour and/or natural variability are still found as a main focus of studies on EMC-vibrational properties from the past 3 decades (Hunt 1997;Kubojima et al 2005a;Jiang et al 2012;Inokuchi et al 1999;Obataya and Norimoto 1995;Obataya et al 1998;Sasaki et al 1988;Viala 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity of sound in wood means that the speed at which wood transmits received energy. Wood with a high sound velocity and low internal damping, best facilitate the transmission of vibrational energy [8]. Therefore, sound velocity is an essential parameter to consider before recommending a material acoustically suitable, especially for making musical instrument.…”
Section: Speed Of Sound (C) and Sound Velocity (V)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates internal stresses due to the volume change, which influences the sound quality of the instrument and the sounding effect becomes unstable. Conversely, woods with better dimensional stability lead to a more stable overall sounding effect of the instrument [42].…”
Section: Physical and Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%