XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics 2020
DOI: 10.47964/1120.9335.19276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Performance Evaluation of a Panel Utilizing Negative Stiffness Mounting for Low Frequency Noise Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, represents the FFR panel approximation as given by Eq. (18). Intuitively, this approximation should constitute the ideal case regarding the STL of a panel with finite dimensions and may act as a reference curve for the various comparisons instead of the infinite panel approximation which is invalid in the lower frequency range that is being examined.…”
Section: Numerical Example -Parametric Investigation Of Stlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, represents the FFR panel approximation as given by Eq. (18). Intuitively, this approximation should constitute the ideal case regarding the STL of a panel with finite dimensions and may act as a reference curve for the various comparisons instead of the infinite panel approximation which is invalid in the lower frequency range that is being examined.…”
Section: Numerical Example -Parametric Investigation Of Stlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of utilizing "soft mounts" to reduce the fundamental frequency of the system delves into the investigation of what constitutes soft mounting. Therefore, a modeling procedure based on certain approximations [18] is formulated in order to provide a projection of the expected level of stiffness that satisfies this terminology and serves the intended purpose. Intuitively, following the general concepts of vibration isolation for the reduction of the eigenfrequency through the reduction of stiffness, supporting an existing panel on elastic mounts, the 'mass law' behavior may be dragged into lower frequencies and the resonant region of the new system panel-mount will be moved below a critical frequency, for example at 20 Hz considering the threshold of human hearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KDamper combines the favourable properties of both the NS and traditional TMD, providing exceptional damping characteristics to the structure. By incorporating the additional NS element, the damper's inertial forces are increased, and the need for large mass is significantly reduced [10,11]. The stiffness-mass elements can be allocated appropriately to create a system that is statically and dynamically stable, maintaining the structure's initial/static stiffness and avoiding potential instabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, attempts have been made towards artificially increasing the resonating mass's inertia via negative stiffness elements or amplification mechanisms. For example, the inclusion of negative stiffness elements to the oscillating system shows promising results in addressing this issue, to a certain extent, revealing the potential of the KDamper (KD) concept [19,28,29] towards the design of low-frequency acoustic metamaterials [30][31][32]. Similarly, inspired by the successful application of inertial amplifiers in engineering applications, several works proved their suitability in the context of periodic structures [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%