2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02024.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic ontogeny of a teleost

Abstract: The influence of growth on the intensity and variability of acoustic echoes from individuals and groups of a teleosts was quantified using Donaldson trout (rainbow-steelhead hybrid) Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish growth was linear in total length (L T ) and quadratic in mass. Dorsal swimbladder area increased exponentially with L T . Allometric growth ratio (i.e. k) values of swimbladder length linearly increased with L T . Average swimbladder volumes occupied 3-6% of fish body volume and increased exponentially wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, negative biological noises were determined to have an adverse effect on fish behavior, whereas studies investigating positive biological noise all resulted in positive responses, but these responses failed to elicit a significant effect size. This is likely due to the low number of studies considered, as it has been suggested and well supported that species, especially those with anatomical modifications for sound projection or reception, can recognize and potentially evaluate sounds related to biological interactions (Fay and Popper ; Horne, ). The lack of research into this topic is understandable given the difficulty associated with replicating natural soundscapes under laboratory conditions; mostly due to issues surrounding the balance between sound pressure and particle velocity within a closed environment (Akamatsu, Okumura, Novarini, & Yan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, negative biological noises were determined to have an adverse effect on fish behavior, whereas studies investigating positive biological noise all resulted in positive responses, but these responses failed to elicit a significant effect size. This is likely due to the low number of studies considered, as it has been suggested and well supported that species, especially those with anatomical modifications for sound projection or reception, can recognize and potentially evaluate sounds related to biological interactions (Fay and Popper ; Horne, ). The lack of research into this topic is understandable given the difficulty associated with replicating natural soundscapes under laboratory conditions; mostly due to issues surrounding the balance between sound pressure and particle velocity within a closed environment (Akamatsu, Okumura, Novarini, & Yan, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well known that a number of fish species, using specifically modified anatomical structures, are able not only to produce but also to receive, to recognise, and to evaluate sounds, especially those related to their species-specific biological demands (Fay and Popper 2000;Frizsch 1999;Horne 2008;Popper and Schilt 2008;Popper et al 2003;Rollo and Higgs 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable among these projects is the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) Hurlburt et al, 2008) and (Anderson et al, 2007;Benoit-Bird, in press;Churnside, 2008Churnside, , 2009aChurnside, , 2009bHorne, 2008;Makris et al, 2006Makris et al, , 2009. This information will be useful for agencies trying to develop means of sustainably managing commer- …”
Section: Ocean Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%