Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus

Abstract

Summary1. Animals produce sounds for diverse biological functions such as defending territories, attracting mates, deterring predators, navigation, finding food and maintaining contact with members of their social group. Biologists can take advantage of these acoustic behaviours to gain valuable insights into the spatial and temporal scales over which individuals and populations interact. Advances in bioacoustic technology, including the development of autonomous cabled and wireless recording arrays, permit data collection at multiple locations over time. These systems are transforming the way we study individuals and populations of animals and are leading to significant advances in our understandings of the complex interactions between animals and their habitats. 2. Here, we review questions that can be addressed using bioacoustic approaches, by providing a primer on technologies and approaches used to study animals at multiple organizational levels by ecologists, behaviourists and conservation biologists. 3. Spatially dispersed groups of microphones (arrays) enable users to study signal directionality on a small scale or to locate animals and track their movements on a larger scale. 4. Advances in algorithm development can allow users to discriminate among species, sexes, age groups and individuals. 5. With such technology, users can remotely and non-invasively survey populations, describe the soundscape, quantify anthropogenic noise, study species interactions, gain new insights into the social dynamics of sound-producing animals and track the effects of factors such as climate change and habitat fragmentation on phenology and biodiversity. 6. There remain many challenges in the use of acoustic monitoring, including the difficulties in performing signal recognition across taxa. The bioacoustics community should focus on developing a *Correspondence author. E-mail: marmots@ucla.edu 2011, 48, 758-767 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x Ó 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology Ó 2011 British Ecological Society common framework for signal recognition that allows for various species' data to be analysed by any recognition system supporting a set of common standards. 7. Synthesis and applications. Microphone arrays are increasingly used to remotely monitor acoustically active animals. We provide examples from a variety of taxa where acoustic arrays have been used for ecological, behavioural and conservation studies. We discuss the technologies used, the methodologies for automating signal recognition and some of the remaining challenges. We also make recommendations for using this technology to aid in wildlife management. Journal of Applied Ecology

Species-specific audio detection: a comparison of three template-based detection algorithms using random forests

“…Although researchers often collect recordings twenty-four hours a day for weeks or months (Acevedo & Villanueva-Rivera, 2006;Brandes, 2008;Lammers et al, 2008;Sueur et al, 2008;Marques et al, 2013;Blumstein et al, 2011), in practice, most studies have only analyzed a small percentage of the total number of recordings.…”

Temporal and spectral variation in advertisement call of males Microhyla achatina (Tschudi, 1838) are sufficient for individual discrimination

“…Most efforts in recognizing individuals are conducted using invasive methods which typically worsen habitat as well as species' subsistence. Development of bio-acoustical tools using animal vocalizations to census threatened wildlife populations would be beneficial in the conservation of all the species, especially those who are threatened and endangered [21,22]. Using bio-acoustical tools, such as applying multimicrophone, we can estimate the number of particular species without capturing and marking each individual.…”

Unifying population and landscape ecology with spatial capture–recapture

“…Acoustic sampling is emerging as a promising technology for sampling vocal species such as birds, anurans, marine mammals, and primates, and the application of these methods is increasing rapidly (Marques et al 2009, Blumstein et al 2011. Information on signal strength and/or direction gives imperfect information about the source of the vocalization although statistically pinpointing the source has been recognized as being analogous to inference about the activity center in SCR methods, and therefore SCR has been adapted to accommodate data obtained by acoustic sampling methods (Dawson and Efford 2009, Borchers et al 2015, Stevenson et al 2015, Kidney et al 2016.…”