2012
DOI: 10.4172/2161-119x.s1-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Measures of Phonation during Connected Speech in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount and number of voice breaks in our normal group were zero, unlike the patient group who obviously had voice breaks. Some researchers believe that voice breaks are one of the main characteristics of spasmodic dysphonia (Sebastian, Gowri, 2014;Dejonckere, Manfredi, 2011 ) and others recognize it as a diagnostic strategy for voice disorders (Dejonckere et al, 2001;Cannito, Buder, Chorna, Dressler, 2012). Consistent with our results, Nicola et al (2006) illustrated that voice break in patients were 27, while it was zero in healthy voice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The amount and number of voice breaks in our normal group were zero, unlike the patient group who obviously had voice breaks. Some researchers believe that voice breaks are one of the main characteristics of spasmodic dysphonia (Sebastian, Gowri, 2014;Dejonckere, Manfredi, 2011 ) and others recognize it as a diagnostic strategy for voice disorders (Dejonckere et al, 2001;Cannito, Buder, Chorna, Dressler, 2012). Consistent with our results, Nicola et al (2006) illustrated that voice break in patients were 27, while it was zero in healthy voice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, data from disordered speakers are needed to determine if glottal kinematics can be aligned with the acoustic signal. As previous research indicates, 41,42 voice disorders may result in aperiodic signals that would make it difficult to determine voicing onset from the acoustic wave. These obstacles need to be evaluated and overcome to be able to apply the current data in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future trials, we suggest using patient perception tests rather than investigator perception tests as the primary outcome. Additional studies of acoustic measurements like vocal spectrograms may provide a reliable objective outcome measure [28]. The fact that patients can be blinded to whether their DBS therapy is "on" or "off" during a trial may add more convincing proof to studies evaluating subjective outcomes.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%