Acoustic evaluation of behavioral states predicted from GPS tracking: a case study of a marine fishing bat

Abstract

Background Multiple methods have been developed to infer behavioral states from animal movement data, but rarely has their accuracy been assessed from independent evidence, especially for location data sampled with high temporal resolution. Here we evaluate the performance of behavioral segmentation methods using acoustic recordings that monitor prey capture attempts. Methods We recorded GPS locations and ultrasonic audio during the foraging trips of 11 Mexican fish-eating bats, Myotis vivesi , using miniature bio-loggers. We then applied five different segmentation algorithms (k-means clustering, expectation-maximization and binary clustering, first-passage time, hidden Markov models, and correlated velocity change point analysis) to infer two behavioral states, foraging and commuting, from the GPS data. To evaluate the inference, we independently identified characteristic patterns of biosonar calls (“feeding buzzes”) that occur during foraging in the audio recordings. We then compared segmentation methods on how well they correctly identified the two behaviors and if their estimates of foraging movement parameters matched those for locations with buzzes. Results While the five methods differed in the median percentage of buzzes occurring during predicted foraging events, or true positive rate (44–75%), a two-state hidden Markov model had the highest median balanced accuracy (67%). Hidden Markov models and first-passage time predicted foraging flight speeds and turn angles similar to those measured at locations with feeding buzzes and did not differ in the number or duration of predicted foraging events. Conclusion The hidden Markov model method performed best at identifying fish-eating bat foraging segments; however, first-passage time was not significantly different and gave similar parameter estimates. This is the first attempt to evaluate segmentation methodologies in echolocating bats and provides an evaluation framework that can be used on other species. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40462-019-0163-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Echolocating bats can adjust sensory acquisition based on internal cues

“…The extra weight was high, but the tagging duration was very short, as 2 days later we managed to retrieve 5 tags (of which one had malfunctioned). We and others have shown that such short tagging periods have minor effects on bats [ 27 – 29 ].…”

Tracking animal movements using biomarkers in tail hairs: a novel approach for animal geolocating from sulfur isoscapes

“…Common animal tracking techniques such as GPS and radio transmitters [ 2 ] are time-intensive to collect, require expensive equipment and pose welfare concerns [ 3 ], and therefore may not be available in all settings nor necessary for addressing certain questions. For instance, characterizing population-level variation in movement patterns, such as the proportion of residents versus migrants, is likely to be inaccurate if one can only tag a handful of individuals over a relatively short period of time [ 4 ]. Forensically recreating movement paths from dead animals, or studying historical connectivity from archived specimens, or studying landscape connectivity, can provide useful insights into the drivers of population dynamics.…”

Environmental and Biological Factors Influencing Dispersal of Neonate Leatherback Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) From an Endangered Costa Rican Nesting Population

“…Statistical tools such as first passage time analyses can allow for the detection of changes in speed in response to environmental conditions at different spatial scales (Fauchald and Tveraa, 2003) and mechanistic movement models such as random walk models (Turchin, 1998), can provide further insight into behavioral processes and states. The application of such approaches to the movement trajectories of marine species has allowed for migratory and foraging behavior (Bailey and Thompson, 2006;Hurme et al, 2019) and navigational abilities (Girard et al, 2006) to be inferred for adult life stages.…”