2000
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.183-187.887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Emission Technique for Pipeline Leak Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The localisation of leak events through acoustic methods can be classified into time-of-flight-based or attenuation-based. Attenuation based relies on the decrease of signal amplitude as the acoustic signals travel across the pipeline while time based monitors the increase of signal transit time [39]. Acoustic emissions result from turbulent pressure fluctuations at the leak, vapor bubbles forming at high velocities and imploding as shock waves on pipe walls.…”
Section: Acoustic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localisation of leak events through acoustic methods can be classified into time-of-flight-based or attenuation-based. Attenuation based relies on the decrease of signal amplitude as the acoustic signals travel across the pipeline while time based monitors the increase of signal transit time [39]. Acoustic emissions result from turbulent pressure fluctuations at the leak, vapor bubbles forming at high velocities and imploding as shock waves on pipe walls.…”
Section: Acoustic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in traditional ultrasonic leakage signal strengthdependent localization methods, the detection of leak location is based on the ultrasonic sound intensity of a single ultrasonic transducer [3], and its localization accuracy depends on the directionality of the sensors and on human judgment of leak location [4][5][6]. Therefore, traditional methods can only roughly determine the scope of a leak and have difficulty determining an accurate position without a large number of ultrasonic transducers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, necessary to develop an effective and reliable damage-detection monitoring method. To date, various engineering approaches, including satellite monitoring [1], cathodic protection (CP) method [2], one-call detection [3], impressed alternating cycle current (IACC) method [4], and acoustic wave signal detection [5], have been used to efficiently localize the damage sources. Satellite monitoring and one-call detection are susceptible to urban congestion limits, whereas CP and IACC methods depend on strong electric power and detection range may be short.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%