2014 Sixth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icmtma.2014.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Emission Monitoring for Film Thickness of Mechanical Seals Based on Feature Dimension Reduction and Cascaded Decision

Abstract: Mechanical seals operates by a thin fluid film to separate the pair of seal faces. The thickness of this film must be optimized for preventing the friction of two end faces and minimizing the leakage. In this study, the fluid film is measured by eddy current and acoustic emission techniques, and the data of eddy current are used to direct the processing of acoustic emission signal. To decrease the noise, wavelet packet and kernel principal component analysis are used to extract the data features. Then cascaded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact seals frequently affect the friction behavior in the whole drive train, and they are exposed to wear. Increasing requirements demand more precise descriptions of the tribological behavior of contact seals in design phases as well as condition monitoring [80,81]. Logozzo and Valigi [82] suggested ANNs as an alternative for analytical models to predict friction instabilities and critical angular speeds of face seals during shaft decelerations.…”
Section: Sealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact seals frequently affect the friction behavior in the whole drive train, and they are exposed to wear. Increasing requirements demand more precise descriptions of the tribological behavior of contact seals in design phases as well as condition monitoring [80,81]. Logozzo and Valigi [82] suggested ANNs as an alternative for analytical models to predict friction instabilities and critical angular speeds of face seals during shaft decelerations.…”
Section: Sealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitigating undesired face contact requires seal redesign and real-time condition monitoring to detect the onset of face contact. Most previous studies focus on detecting contact experimentally using methods such as vibration monitoring [15,16,18], ultrasonic techniques [19][20][21], acoustic emission [22,23] or a combination of methods [24]. Others have used these same experimental measurement techniques to heuristically identify contact signatures and apply these signatures to an activelycontrolled seal in an attempt to eliminate contact [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have attempted to apply machine learning to the AE signals generated from mechanical seals. Zhang and Li 10 developed artificial neural networks (ANNs) which distinguished between the intervals wherein the seal face separation lies using AE signals decomposed with wavelet transform. Li et al 11 developed a method based on the genetic particle filters with autoregression and hypersphere support vector machines (SVMs) to distinguish between the contact state categories using AE signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%