2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic emission characterization of the marginal disintegration of dental composite restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stainless steel displayed the highest maximum contraction rate which was about 8.3 times higher than that of PMMA. Such a large value for the stiff steel material was caused by its high Young's modulus as compared to low modulus of PMMA ring 9) . For the human molar tooth, its maximum stress and maximum contraction rate were ranked intermediate between and statistically different from stain steel and PMMA.…”
Section: Polymerization Contraction Stress Of Composite Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Stainless steel displayed the highest maximum contraction rate which was about 8.3 times higher than that of PMMA. Such a large value for the stiff steel material was caused by its high Young's modulus as compared to low modulus of PMMA ring 9) . For the human molar tooth, its maximum stress and maximum contraction rate were ranked intermediate between and statistically different from stain steel and PMMA.…”
Section: Polymerization Contraction Stress Of Composite Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the elastic ring method as previously described 1,8,9) , polymerization contraction stress developed at composite restoration margin (i.e., composite-substrate interface on the inner surface of ring substrate) was measured based on circumferential stress on the outer surface of ring substrate. Measurements were performed seven times for each ring substrate.…”
Section: Contraction Stress Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations