1991
DOI: 10.1109/48.90903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Doppler current profiler performance in near surface and bottom boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This noise complicated the identification of a diurnal signal in the hourly velocity record (Figures 2d and 2e), requiring the use of the composites and averaging in the analyses described below. The shallow limit of the upward-looking ADCP profile is set by sidelobe interference from the surface (Appell et al, 1991), and thus depends on how shallow the ADCP instrument was mounted; for these sites, the shallowest usable data occurred around 11-m depth. Velocity data were leveled using pressure measured at the ADCP instrument and interpolated to a fixed 2-m vertical grid.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise complicated the identification of a diurnal signal in the hourly velocity record (Figures 2d and 2e), requiring the use of the composites and averaging in the analyses described below. The shallow limit of the upward-looking ADCP profile is set by sidelobe interference from the surface (Appell et al, 1991), and thus depends on how shallow the ADCP instrument was mounted; for these sites, the shallowest usable data occurred around 11-m depth. Velocity data were leveled using pressure measured at the ADCP instrument and interpolated to a fixed 2-m vertical grid.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data obtained when the ship was turning or accelerating were eliminated from our analysis by screening out data acquired when the ship speed was less than 1.5 m s −1 . We also eliminated observations from the bottom 10% of the water column where bias resulting from the bottom reflection of the acoustic sidelobe occurs [ Appell et al ., ]. East and north velocity components were rotated to a coordinate system oriented 30° to the north of east (a direction consistent with the orientation of the tidal major axis in the western sound) to produce along‐estuary and across‐estuary components.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP) do not provide reliable water velocity measurements near the sea surface or bottom because acoustic sidelobe reflections from the boundary contaminate the Doppler velocity measurements (Appell et al 1991). Even though the acoustic sidelobes are much weaker than the main beams (e.g., Appell et al 1991;Gordon 1996), the surface reflection is ∼40 dB (or 100 times) stronger than from particles in the water. Consequently, sidelobe reflections from the surface can be as strong as the main beam returns from the water column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, sidelobe reflections from the surface can be as strong as the main beam returns from the water column. As a result, acoustic returns from the main beams are only useful for calculating currents prior to the arrival of the vertical sidelobe reflection from the sea surface (Appell et al 1991;Gordon 1996). From the ADCP beam geometry (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation