2007
DOI: 10.1121/1.2801545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: A study of resynthesized speech

Abstract: It has been posited that the role of prosody in lexical segmentation is elevated when the speech signal is degraded or unreliable. Using predictions from Cutler and Norris' [J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 113-121 (1988)] metrical segmentation strategy hypothesis as a framework, this investigation examined how individual suprasegmental and segmental cues to syllabic stress contribute differentially to the recognition of strong and weak syllables for the purpose of lexical segmentation. Syllabic con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another open question is whether the ability to track rhythmic structure despite conflicting information relates to language skills. Durational cues can be a useful cue for word segregation (Mattys, 2004;Cutler & Butterfield, 1992;Smith, Cutler, Butterfield, & Nimmo-Smith, 1989;Nakatani & Schaffer, 1977), especially when speech is presented in noise (Spitzer, Liss, & Mattys, 2007). Thus, the ability to ignore distractor stimuli (background talkers) when tracking rhythm from a particular sound source (a target talker) may be useful for both music and speech processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another open question is whether the ability to track rhythmic structure despite conflicting information relates to language skills. Durational cues can be a useful cue for word segregation (Mattys, 2004;Cutler & Butterfield, 1992;Smith, Cutler, Butterfield, & Nimmo-Smith, 1989;Nakatani & Schaffer, 1977), especially when speech is presented in noise (Spitzer, Liss, & Mattys, 2007). Thus, the ability to ignore distractor stimuli (background talkers) when tracking rhythm from a particular sound source (a target talker) may be useful for both music and speech processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the fi nal lengthening cue was combined with F0 rise to assess whether a combination of potential prosodic cues to phrase-fi nal position can help lexical segmentation in a cumulative way-that is, whether listeners benefi t more when they are exposed to lengthening and F0 rise cues together, as opposed to when they are exposed to one cue at a time. Some previous work has suggested that listeners might be able to use available segmentation cues in a cumulative way (Spitzer, Liss, & Mattys, 2007 ). If this were the case, both Korean and Dutch listeners' learning performance may improve with the use of combined cues as opposed to just one prosodic cue.…”
Section: F0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among nonhabitual conditions, both measures of F0 tended to be maximized in the hearing impaired condition, followed by the overenunciate condition and then the clear condition. Sentence-level F0 range has further been proposed to be of perceptual importance, whereby narrower ranges have been associated with a decrease in intelligibility (Binns & Culling, 2007;Bunton, Kent, Kent, & Rosenbek, 2000;Laures & Bunton, 2003;Laures & Weismer, 1999;Miller, Schlauch, & Watson, 2010;Mori, Kobayashi, Kasuya, Kobayashi, & Hirose, 2005;Spitzer, Liss, & Mattys, 2007;Watson & Schlauch, 2008). Thus, further investigating the acoustic-perceptual relationship between F0 and intelligibility is of importance in identifying the clear speech variants that best maximize intelligibility.…”
Section: Condition Effects: Suprasegmental Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%