2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic characterization of cavitation intensity: A review

Abstract: Highlights Classification of cavitation as stable or inertial is inadequate in some cases. Cavitation intensity may be underestimated due to inaccurate frequency filtering. Pure cavitation noise should be used to character cavitation intensity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the cavitation thresholds set for feedback control in those studies were relative or normalized values that varied largely among different ultrasound systems. Wu et al pointed out that the current spectrum-based methods for cavitation threshold calculation is controversial and they recommended a total integration of real cavitation noise over the full spectrum [153] . Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an international cavitation quantification standard for cross-comparisons of cavitation thresholds and pre-clinical outcomes reported by different research groups.…”
Section: In-situ Cavitation Imaging and Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the cavitation thresholds set for feedback control in those studies were relative or normalized values that varied largely among different ultrasound systems. Wu et al pointed out that the current spectrum-based methods for cavitation threshold calculation is controversial and they recommended a total integration of real cavitation noise over the full spectrum [153] . Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an international cavitation quantification standard for cross-comparisons of cavitation thresholds and pre-clinical outcomes reported by different research groups.…”
Section: In-situ Cavitation Imaging and Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ultrasonic pressure reaches a certain threshold, the surrounding liquid is rapidly filled with small cavities of gas and steam, forming microbubbles (MBs), also known as cavitation nuclei. Under the activity of ultrasound, these MBs continue to vibrate, expand and contract, which, when finally burst and collapse (37,38), release instantaneous energy and cause extreme physical phenomena such as luminescence, high temperature, high pressure, discharge, and microjet (39).…”
Section: Overview On Utmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous spectrum stands for transient cavitation [9] , [16] , [21] , [22] , while the line spectra reflect the dynamic characteristics of stable cavitation [23] , [17] . However, its compositions are complex [24] : in addition to the direct field, cavitation bubbles and linearly pulsating bubbles can also oscillate at a fundamental frequency f 0 and emit a fundamental acoustic signal; nonlinear oscillations of bubbles [25] , as well as large amplitude nonlinear vibration of transducer and waveform distortion in nonlinear acoustic wave propagation, can cause harmonic nf 0 ; the subharmonic 0.5f 0 and ultraharmonic (n + 0.5)f 0 peaks attributed to the combined effects of period doubling [26] , subharmonic oscillations [27] , chaotic oscillations and microjet emission [28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%