1994
DOI: 10.1121/1.409456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels

Abstract: This study was designed as a replication and extension of the classic study of vowel acoustics by Peterson and Barney (PB) [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175–184 (1952)]. Recordings were made of 50 men, 50 women, and 50 children producing the vowels /i, i, eh, æ, hooked backward eh, inverted vee), a, open oh, u, u/ in h–V–d syllables. Formant contours for F1–F4 were measured from LPC spectra using a custom interactive editing tool. For comparison with the PB data, formant patterns were sampled at a time that was jud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

59
923
6
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(993 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
59
923
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These cues have been shown to be sufficient for normal hearing listeners to achieve high levels of vowel recognition when listening to monophthongal vowels (Peterson and Barney, 1952;Chistovich and Lublinskaya, 1979;and Hillenbrand et al 1995). Therefore, out of the 12 vowels used by Fu et al (2002), only the vowel identification data that included the nine nominally monophthongal vowels (in /h/-vowel-/d/ context) were used in the present study : 'had', 'hawed', 'head', 'heed', 'hid', 'hod', 'hood', 'hud', and 'who'd'. That is, the diphthongs 'hayed' and 'hoed' were excluded because they are characterized by time-varying formant cues, and the r-colored vowel 'heard' was excluded because it is characterized by a low third formant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cues have been shown to be sufficient for normal hearing listeners to achieve high levels of vowel recognition when listening to monophthongal vowels (Peterson and Barney, 1952;Chistovich and Lublinskaya, 1979;and Hillenbrand et al 1995). Therefore, out of the 12 vowels used by Fu et al (2002), only the vowel identification data that included the nine nominally monophthongal vowels (in /h/-vowel-/d/ context) were used in the present study : 'had', 'hawed', 'head', 'heed', 'hid', 'hod', 'hood', 'hud', and 'who'd'. That is, the diphthongs 'hayed' and 'hoed' were excluded because they are characterized by time-varying formant cues, and the r-colored vowel 'heard' was excluded because it is characterized by a low third formant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…natural productions recorded from five men, five women, and five children (one production each), and were drawn from the larger corpus of speech samples collected by Hillenbrand et al (1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vowel and consonant syllable identification tests were administered. The vowel syllable identification test used 12 vowels presented in a /h/-vowel-/d/ context (had, hayed, hawed, head, heard, heed, hid, hod, hoad, hood, hud, who'd) (Hillenbrand et al 1995). Two male (talkers 48 and 49) and two female (talkers 39 and 44) talkers were used of the multiple talkers available in these test materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vowel set included 10 monophthongs (/i I ( ae u H a 0 c `Ą /) and two diphthongs (/o e/), presented in a /h/-vowel-/d/ context. The tokens for vowel recognition test were digitized natural productions from five men and five women drawn from speech samples collected by Hillenbrand et al (1995). Consonant recognition was measured in a 20-alternative identification paradigm.…”
Section: Test and Training Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%