2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00782-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic analysis and detection of pharyngeal fricative in cleft palate speech using correlation of signals in independent frequency bands and octave spectrum prominent peak

Abstract: Background: Pharyngeal fricative is one typical compensatory articulation error of cleft palate speech. It passively influences daily communication for people who suffer from it. The automatic detection of pharyngeal fricatives in cleft palate speech can provide information for clinical doctors and speech-language pathologists to aid in diagnosis. Results: This paper proposes two features (CSIFs: correlation of signals in independent frequency bands; OSPP: octave spectrum prominent peak) to detect pharyngeal f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 While abnormal resonance can be detected perceptually, attributing any difficulties in this area to tongue posture is difficult without instrumental analysis. Likewise, acoustic analysis can be used to identify errors such as pharyngeal fricatives 7 but there is no easy way to use it to identify increased raising of the tongue body. This can be achieved with articulatory instrumentation such as x-ray imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 While abnormal resonance can be detected perceptually, attributing any difficulties in this area to tongue posture is difficult without instrumental analysis. Likewise, acoustic analysis can be used to identify errors such as pharyngeal fricatives 7 but there is no easy way to use it to identify increased raising of the tongue body. This can be achieved with articulatory instrumentation such as x-ray imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%