2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00127-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Analyses of Developmental Changes and Emotional Expression in the Preverbal Vocalizations of Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for these findings could be that noisy calls are easier for young individuals to produce than are tonal calls, since they require relatively little control over the vocal apparatus (e.g., Lieberman 1986). It has been suggested that in humans, an age-related increase in tonality of infant calls is likely to be brought about by an improvement of the subglottal air pressure control as individuals grow (Boliek et al 1996;Scheiner et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for these findings could be that noisy calls are easier for young individuals to produce than are tonal calls, since they require relatively little control over the vocal apparatus (e.g., Lieberman 1986). It has been suggested that in humans, an age-related increase in tonality of infant calls is likely to be brought about by an improvement of the subglottal air pressure control as individuals grow (Boliek et al 1996;Scheiner et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the non-specific alarm calls produced by meerkats, the majority of which are typically noisy in structure and therefore require relatively little control over the vocal apparatus (e.g. Lieberman 1986;Hammerschmidt et al 2001;Scheiner et al 2002), are easier for young to produce. Both maturation processes as well as training of muscular coordination can improve this control (Boliek et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last finding provides a parallel to Provine's ͑1993͒ report that laughter "punctuates" rather than interrupting speech flow in normally hearing talkers. However, only Scheiner et al ͑2002; reported acoustic analyses in this earlier work, and their limited sample size did not allow detailed comparison of laugh acoustics in the impaired and normally hearing groups. Inferences about possible effects of experience on finer-grained aspects of vocal acoustics were also hindered by the fact that each of the impaired infants received a hearing aid during the course of the study.…”
Section: A Laughter and Auditory Experiencementioning
confidence: 93%