1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00299886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic adaptation in pygmy marmoset contact calls: Locational cues vary with distances between conspecifics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The social framework influences intragroup vocal communication [e.g., Snowdon & Hausberger, 1997]. For example, call usage is developmentally acquired via social learning from adults [e.g., Seyfarth & Cheney, 1986].…”
Section: Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social framework influences intragroup vocal communication [e.g., Snowdon & Hausberger, 1997]. For example, call usage is developmentally acquired via social learning from adults [e.g., Seyfarth & Cheney, 1986].…”
Section: Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affiliative vocalizations occur in a variety of contexts, including temporary social separation (pygmy marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea) [Snowdon & Hodun, 1981] and bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) [Janik & Slater, 1998]); reunion after separation (rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) [Kalin et al, 1992]; and ongoing affiliative contact (Japanese macaques (M. fuscata) [Blount, 1985;Masataka, 1989]). While previous work showed that squirrel monkey chuck exchanges occurred mostly during ongoing affiliative contact [Smith et al, 1982a], the present results indicate that the chuck stimulus alone is sufficient to elicit a chuck response in a nearby affiliated partner, independent of ongoing social activity.…”
Section: Social Function Of the Chuckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of usage: (a) see examples a and b for hmm; (b) mixed with hmms by Lcl group young adult and adolescent males while walk ing along a path next to the intermediary fence (seemingly awaiting the arrival of Lc2 group); each male's pace and direction of trav el along the fence was independent of the oth ers, and therefore interindividual distances were frequently greater than during cohesive group progressions; (c) huhs were emitted oc casionally during typical group progressions and were given at these times by immatures. Interferred function: similar to hmm but marks a caller's location more effectively [37], Vocalization: 'Pun [18]. Spectrograms: figure In.…”
Section: Adult Vocalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%