1992
DOI: 10.1159/000261417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid-Susceptibility of Lesions in Bovine Enamel after Remineralization in the Presence of Fluoride and/or Carbonate

Abstract: After de- and subsequent remineralization at 0.03 and 1.0 ppm fluoride and either 0, 1, 10, 20 or 25 mM carbonate, artificial lesions in bovine enamel were demineralized again. The amount of secondary demineralization was determined after 15,30 and 70 h of demineralization by means of quantitative microradiography. The results showed that fluoride incorporated during the remineralization period retards lesion formation during secondary demineralization. Carbonate incorporated during the remineralization period… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lamination observed in the lesions which remineralised was consistent with previous studies into remineralisation at low pH [e.g. Lammers et al, 1992]. It has been suggested [Theuns, 1987] that lamination occurs at low pH and relatively high fl uoride concentrations, through demineralisation of more soluble enamel deeper within a lesion beneath relatively insoluble fl uoridated mineral in the lesion body occurring at a depth at which fl uoride is not available to retard demineralisation, most or all having been incorporated into the lesion body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The lamination observed in the lesions which remineralised was consistent with previous studies into remineralisation at low pH [e.g. Lammers et al, 1992]. It has been suggested [Theuns, 1987] that lamination occurs at low pH and relatively high fl uoride concentrations, through demineralisation of more soluble enamel deeper within a lesion beneath relatively insoluble fl uoridated mineral in the lesion body occurring at a depth at which fl uoride is not available to retard demineralisation, most or all having been incorporated into the lesion body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In vitro, it has been shown that fl uoride can penetrate into sound enamel up to 100 m [Tyler and Poole, 1984] and even through partly demineralised enamel into dentine [ten Cate, 2001]. It has been suggested that partly demineralised enamel is more 'open' to fl uoride diffusion and therefore protects the underlying sound tissue [Lammers et al, 1992]. Lammers et al [1992] proposed that diffusion of mineral ions through the highly mineralised front of the lesion (MXB) was inhibited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that partly demineralised enamel is more 'open' to fl uoride diffusion and therefore protects the underlying sound tissue [Lammers et al, 1992]. Lammers et al [1992] proposed that diffusion of mineral ions through the highly mineralised front of the lesion (MXB) was inhibited. In the present study, it was indicated that fl uoride could protect even the sound tissue beyond the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage the lesion consists of enamel in which the structural architecture is intact but where some crystals have been removed in whole or part by acid dissolution. F in solution in the oral environment promotes the precipitation of apatite and is itself incorporated into the new crystals, and thus, into the repaired enamel [Hallsworth et al, 1976;Damato et al, 1990;Lammers et al, 1991Lammers et al, , 1992. However, it seems that F may not penetrate deep into the 'body' of enamel lesions and so promote remineralisation at that site because it is absorbed by the outer enamel as it diffuses inwards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%