2010 International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iceea.2010.5596144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid mine drainage - effect on creeks or streams in a mining community in Ghana and treatment options

Abstract: Heavy metals contamination and other physico chemical changes in underground and surface water by acid mine drainage (AMD) were determined on the impact on creeks or streams. High levels of these metals have been reported in mmmg areas over the years; however, investigations indicates that less monitoring has been done on water discharged as effluent for effective maintenance mechanisms to be effected. Field and laboratory studies were carried out within the mining community on Latitude S 2" 35 W and Longitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When these ions get into solution, sulfuric acid is produced rendering the water acidic. Equations (1.1)-(1.3) below summarize the oxidation of pyrite: This acidic effluent produced during the mining process is called 'Acid Mine Drainage' (AMD) [5,6]. AMD is a major pollutant resulting in enhanced acidity of water bodies wherever it exists [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these ions get into solution, sulfuric acid is produced rendering the water acidic. Equations (1.1)-(1.3) below summarize the oxidation of pyrite: This acidic effluent produced during the mining process is called 'Acid Mine Drainage' (AMD) [5,6]. AMD is a major pollutant resulting in enhanced acidity of water bodies wherever it exists [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration range was determined to be 4020 to 6 020 mg/L for cations and 607 to 759 mg/L for anions with averages of 4020 and 607 mg/L, respectively. The dominance of Cl -and Na + ions in the OPGW further provided evidence of percolation into the open pit from an external saline source [37]. Other anions observed in the OPGW were F -and PO 4 3-, although at a low concentration of 5.4 to 9.6 mg/L and 3.51 to 3.77 mg/L, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Overall, water quality parameters are evaluated by comparative analyses with national guidelines [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. The hydrochemical parameters of the OPGW were compared to SANS and WHO drinking water guidelines., with the OPGW having a relatively high turbidity values between 502 and 556 NTU, a significant parameter indicative of the unsuitability of the OPGW for drinking [45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtered water samples were analysed by Ion Chromatography (IC) for seven anions, namely the halogens (F − , Br − , Cl − ), the nutrients (NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N, PO 4 -P) and 2 4SO − , the best indicator for AMD pollution [24]. The Metrohm, 861 Advanced Compact IC used was set at 17 minutes analysis time for each sample by the ASUPP4-250.…”
Section: Anion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%