2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid and ferric sulfate bioleaching of uranium ores: A review #

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially (1-18 d), the total Fe concentration in the leaching solution remained stable, then slowly increased in the second stage (18-42 d), rapidly increased in the third stage (42-54 d) and finally entered the stationary phase (54-74 d) (Figure 3a). In the control group, the same trend was observed except that the Fe concentration was lower, suggesting the oxidation of sulfur and iron speciation have an impact on the leaching of Fe [33,34]. In a natural environment, a coal gangue dump often experiences spontaneous combustion with pyrite oxidation via air and moisture as the main chemical reaction [35].…”
Section: Metal Ions Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Initially (1-18 d), the total Fe concentration in the leaching solution remained stable, then slowly increased in the second stage (18-42 d), rapidly increased in the third stage (42-54 d) and finally entered the stationary phase (54-74 d) (Figure 3a). In the control group, the same trend was observed except that the Fe concentration was lower, suggesting the oxidation of sulfur and iron speciation have an impact on the leaching of Fe [33,34]. In a natural environment, a coal gangue dump often experiences spontaneous combustion with pyrite oxidation via air and moisture as the main chemical reaction [35].…”
Section: Metal Ions Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Due to mild operation conditions and relative simplicity of the process, bioleaching could be more costefficient and environmentally friendly process compared to the currently applied physicochemical methods [10][11][12]. Acidophilic bioleaching, which is commercially utilized to leach metals from sulfidic minerals [13], would require addition of sulfur source and pH adjustment to a pH of 2.0 or below [14], while spent NiMH batteries as a nonsulfidic secondary metal source with alkaline nature could be more amenable to heterotrophic bioleaching [15,16]. Heterotrophic microorganisms such as G. oxydans and S. pilosus can utilize organic carbon sources such as glucose to produce organic acids such as gluconic acid and pyruvic acid, respectively [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve selective metal leaching, environmentally sound cost-effective and easyto-use technologies are required. These technologies include biohydrometallurgical approaches (particularly, bioleaching/biooxidation) that are applied at industrial mining and metallurgical enterprises worldwide for the recovery of metals from sulfidic raw materials [3][4][5][6]. These bio-approaches are based on the activity of communities of acidophilic chemolithotrophic microorganisms that oxidize ferrous iron, elemental sulfur (S 0 ), reduced inorganic sulfur compounds (RISCs), and sulfide minerals [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%