Achsen und Radaufhängungen

Ersoy, Metin; Heißing, Bernd; Gies, Stefan

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-15468-4_14

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Literatures [49] [50] [51] mentioned that the assessment methods could be classified in different ways:…”

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Generally, it could be stated that increasing objective assessment based on measurement and simulation is being applied in the design and basic tuning stage. However, the final fine tuning is still done by subjective assessment of test drivers, mainly through closed-loop driving tests [51].…”

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With standardized objective test maneuvers, diverse aspects of the vehicle or subsystem characteristics can be extracted with high accuracy and reproducibility. However, since in the end it is the driving behavior as a whole that has an effect on people, the subjective assessment method cannot be replaced so far [51]. The subjective assessment is based on the human ability to integrally assess dynamic system characteristics, which are composed of complex multidimensional stimuli [56].…”

Section: Subjective Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

State of the Art: Ongoing Research in Assessment Methods for Lane Keeping Assistance Systems

Wei

Pfeffer

Edelmann

2024

IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A safe, comfortable and intelligent Lane Keeping Assistance System (LKAS) is fundamental on the way to realizing full automated driving. In spite of the current high market penetration of LKAS, vehicle manufacturers, suppliers and researchers are still working on improving the system to reach a higher customer acceptance. To achieve this goal more efficiently, a systematic and ideally objective assessment procedure of the system needs to be established. Till date, a thorough review study of the assessment procedures of LKAS does not exist, especially of those which also take the subjective impression of the driver into consideration. The motivation of this paper is to benchmark the state-of-the-art assessment methods of LKAS and identify where problems and research potentials lie. The paper summarizes the relevant characteristics of LKAS based on representative research in the past decades. It also compares the characterization of LKAS with the field of steering feel and vehicle handling in the aspects of procedure, strategy, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. This paper contributes to transferring the know-hows and valuable experiences from other well-developed fields of vehicle dynamics into the rapid-evolving branch of Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), in order to help standardizing its assessment procedure and give insights on system design from a human-centered perspective in the early development phase, thus shortening the ADAS development cycles.

show abstract

“…Literatures [49] [50] [51] mentioned that the assessment methods could be classified in different ways:…”

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%