2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1085-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achilles tendon surgical revision with synthetic augmentation

Abstract: In this paper we report about a 50-year-old patient who underwent a surgical revision procedure for rupture of the right Achilles tendon with the use of Ligastic((R)) synthetic graft in 1995, and in which a strong reactive immune response took place over the graft 11 years after. As far as we know, this is the first case described in literature of long-term follow-up inflammatory reaction after the use of such augmentation grafts in Achilles tendon repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other authors, such as Aracil et al 2 and Wong et al 20 , did not report the same positive results and complained about high re-rupture rates and sural nerve injuries. Some authors tried to reinforce their surgical procedure with the use of autologous or synthetic augmentations, but even in these cases results were not uniform [29][30][31][32] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors, such as Aracil et al 2 and Wong et al 20 , did not report the same positive results and complained about high re-rupture rates and sural nerve injuries. Some authors tried to reinforce their surgical procedure with the use of autologous or synthetic augmentations, but even in these cases results were not uniform [29][30][31][32] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bond et al, 2008;Wong et al, 2010) "vs. pre (Rotini et al, 2011) "vs. pre (Badhe et al, 2008;Cho et al, 2014) #vs. pre (Sears et al, 2015) "vs. pre (Encalada-Diaz et al, 2011) "vs. pre (Russo et al, 2011) Abbreviations Clinical indices AOFAS "vs. pre (Lee, 2008) "vs. pre (Elias et al, 2009;Wegrzyn et al, 2010) "vs. pre (Esenyel et al, 2014) "vs. pre (Ibrahim, 2009) RTA score "vs. pre (Lee, 2008) Strength "vs. pre (Branch, 2011) =vs. pre (Elias et al, 2009); #vs. pre (Wegrzyn et al, 2010) #vs. pre (Nilsson-Helander et al, 2008) Overall function "vs. pre (Branch, 2011) "vs. pre (Ollivere et al, 2014) "vs. pre (Nilsson-Helander et al, 2008) "vs. pre (Esenyel et al, 2014) "vs. pre (Bibbo, 2010) " …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, patients feel better when the repaired tendon heals 13 ; to enhance healing, the medical community has actively sought the augmentation of tendon repairs with two types of augmentation grafts, namely biologic and synthetic. Synthetic graft exhibit stronger mechanical strength, in severely neglected repairs was recommended for this capability to act as permanent replacement tissue 14,15 . Artelon ® is a porous polyurethane urea synthetic graft, which performs as a scaffold allowing ingrowth of host tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%