2019
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving the Goals of Translational Science in Public Health Intervention Research: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that a process of variation and selection is our best hope for evolving not only effective interventions, but more effective experimental designs. Guastaferro and Collins [69] describe the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), which involves a factorial design for assessing the relative impact of multiple intervention components. For example, one might have a community intervention consisting of three components: a school intervention to involve students in emission reduction, a household component to influence emission behavior, and a policy initiative to require organizations to audit and reduce their emissions.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that a process of variation and selection is our best hope for evolving not only effective interventions, but more effective experimental designs. Guastaferro and Collins [69] describe the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), which involves a factorial design for assessing the relative impact of multiple intervention components. For example, one might have a community intervention consisting of three components: a school intervention to involve students in emission reduction, a household component to influence emission behavior, and a policy initiative to require organizations to audit and reduce their emissions.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus traditional meta-analytic statistical approaches constrain the types of studies that are included and evidence that is evaluated in the analysis. Recent advances in RCT design include optimization designs in the intended setting for the intended population, and Hybrid 2 designs that first test the efficacy of the intervention and then effectiveness in the intended population, 13,14 that have been formulated to address these limitations. However, foundational efficacy studies modeling a main outcome are most often used in traditional meta-analyses.…”
Section: What Information Do Traditional Meta-analytic Methods Providmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 These considerations are increasingly incorporated into adaptive designs and implementation trial design such as Hybrid 2 designs, after efficacy has been established. 13,14 This information could potentially be obtained from natural experiments, that is, those that do not randomize participants and conduct the intervention in the intended context: the community or health care setting. These are studies not traditionally included in meta-analyses.…”
Section: What Information Do Traditional Meta-analytic Methods Providmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One experimental method that should also be tried is the MOST design (Guastaferro and Collins 2019). These factorial designs are valuable for efficiently identifying which components of an intervention and which combination of components are most effective.…”
Section: Developing the Most Effective Research Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%