2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7753-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Success in Family Language Policy: Parents, Children and Educators in Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Family language policy is defined as ‘explicit’ (Shohamy, ) and ‘overt’ (Schiffman, ) as well as ‘invisible’ (Curdt‐Christiansen, ) planning in relation to language use among the members at home (King et al., ). Providing a useful framework to unite studies on language socialization, child language acquisition and language policy, the growing body of research has provided a wealth of information on family members’ language‐related beliefs and ideologies, management (decisions to alter the situation), and practices (daily interactions) and their influence on the younger generation's linguistic skills in a variety of contexts (Bezcioglu‐Goktolga & Yagmur, ; Caldas, ; Curdt‐Christiansen, ; Curdt‐Christiansen & Lanza, ; De Houwer, ; Fogle & King, 2017; Haque, ; Lanza, ; Luykx, ; Macalister & Mirvahedi, ; Oriyama, ; Schwartz & Verschik, ; Smith‐Christmas, ; Soler & Zabrodskaja, ; Yu, ; Zhu & Li, ). Collectively, language policies and practices of families are crucial as to whether a language is transmitted across generations, and thus, maintained or lost (Fishman, ), and how cultural values and norms are reproduced or transformed (Garrett & Baquedano‐López, ).…”
Section: Family Language Policy and Language Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family language policy is defined as ‘explicit’ (Shohamy, ) and ‘overt’ (Schiffman, ) as well as ‘invisible’ (Curdt‐Christiansen, ) planning in relation to language use among the members at home (King et al., ). Providing a useful framework to unite studies on language socialization, child language acquisition and language policy, the growing body of research has provided a wealth of information on family members’ language‐related beliefs and ideologies, management (decisions to alter the situation), and practices (daily interactions) and their influence on the younger generation's linguistic skills in a variety of contexts (Bezcioglu‐Goktolga & Yagmur, ; Caldas, ; Curdt‐Christiansen, ; Curdt‐Christiansen & Lanza, ; De Houwer, ; Fogle & King, 2017; Haque, ; Lanza, ; Luykx, ; Macalister & Mirvahedi, ; Oriyama, ; Schwartz & Verschik, ; Smith‐Christmas, ; Soler & Zabrodskaja, ; Yu, ; Zhu & Li, ). Collectively, language policies and practices of families are crucial as to whether a language is transmitted across generations, and thus, maintained or lost (Fishman, ), and how cultural values and norms are reproduced or transformed (Garrett & Baquedano‐López, ).…”
Section: Family Language Policy and Language Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between families and educational institutions is one of the most crucial domains in language policy studies (Schwartz and Verschik 2013). Educational institutions have a very powerful impact on parental beliefs, familial language practices, and most importantly, children's attitudes toward a specific language.…”
Section: Main Theoretical Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, both responses reflect our idea of establishing English as the family language. Regarding code-mixing, a practice that only accomplished bilingual people are able to do successfully (Schwartz & Verschik, 2013b), we all do it sometimes when we are together, but never in a monolingual context. Nevertheless, we try not to mix as my husband and I have always thought it might weaken our competence in our languages.…”
Section: The Children's Command Of Their Two Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%