2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2018.2800407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Robust Average Consensus Over Lossy Wireless Networks

Abstract: International audienceAverage consensus over unreliable wireless networks can be impaired by losses. In this paper we study a novel method to compensate for the lost information, when packet collisions cause transmitter-based random failures. This compensation makes the network converge to the average of the initial states of the network, by modifying the weights of the links to accommodate for the topology changes due to packet losses. Additionally, a gain is used to increase the convergence speed, and an ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lower convergence rate) and a higher deceleration. This statement is concluded also in [35]. In [37], the experiments show that a higher probability of the successful transmission (and so, a lower value of a communication breakdown) ensures a higher convergence rate.…”
Section: Discussion About Achieved Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…lower convergence rate) and a higher deceleration. This statement is concluded also in [35]. In [37], the experiments show that a higher probability of the successful transmission (and so, a lower value of a communication breakdown) ensures a higher convergence rate.…”
Section: Discussion About Achieved Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This statement is confirmed in [35], where the authors change the connectivity probability and its lower values result in a slower convergence rate.…”
Section: Discussion About Achieved Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the other type of consensus problems, validity property is stated differently or not defined. For example, validity property for average consensus [1] and max-min consensus [8], which are mostly used in robotics, is not defined. In this paper, we focus on a subset of the first type which is subject to FLP [4] (it is leader-based and should provide strong consistency in addition to satisfying validity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%