2005
DOI: 10.1108/01435120510623764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving readiness for organisational change

Abstract: Purpose -Seeks to ontinue discussion of the critical role of people in organisational change. Design/methodology/approach -Focuses on the importance of achieving change readiness, ways in which this may be achieved and means to assess organisational readiness for change. Findings -Achieving and sustaining effective organisational change and renewal are an imperative. The people in organisations can be either the key to achieving effective change, or the biggest obstacles to success. Originality/value -Highligh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
83
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In meeting the above aims, the authors firstly contrast the influence of behavioral (extrinsic) and attitudinal (intrinsic) factors on employee reactions to change, noting that despite the prevalence of readiness change factors, researchers have not systematically tested the combined influence of both behavioral (extrinsic) and attitudinal (intrinsic) factors during organizational change (Armenakis et al, 1993;Chang, 1999;Elias, 2009). Following this, the authors demonstrate how employees' mental templates affect their choice to engage in organization goals, wherein the theoretical importance of the context of readiness to change is 6 discussed (Armenakis et al, 1993;Bernerth, 2004;Desplaces, 2005;Smith, 2005;Choi and Ruona, 2010) and a rationale for developing an empirical investigation approach is provided with resulting findings from a public sector case organisation where organisational change was in effect. This further supports the literature and topical debate in the field which asserts that attitudes and behaviors can be developed by a choice of employees, rather than a forced adaptation, as attitudes are generally reflected through salary, job promotion, organizational loyalty and organizational identification factors.…”
Section: Insert Figure 1 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In meeting the above aims, the authors firstly contrast the influence of behavioral (extrinsic) and attitudinal (intrinsic) factors on employee reactions to change, noting that despite the prevalence of readiness change factors, researchers have not systematically tested the combined influence of both behavioral (extrinsic) and attitudinal (intrinsic) factors during organizational change (Armenakis et al, 1993;Chang, 1999;Elias, 2009). Following this, the authors demonstrate how employees' mental templates affect their choice to engage in organization goals, wherein the theoretical importance of the context of readiness to change is 6 discussed (Armenakis et al, 1993;Bernerth, 2004;Desplaces, 2005;Smith, 2005;Choi and Ruona, 2010) and a rationale for developing an empirical investigation approach is provided with resulting findings from a public sector case organisation where organisational change was in effect. This further supports the literature and topical debate in the field which asserts that attitudes and behaviors can be developed by a choice of employees, rather than a forced adaptation, as attitudes are generally reflected through salary, job promotion, organizational loyalty and organizational identification factors.…”
Section: Insert Figure 1 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…this construct involves "organizational members' beliefs, attitudes and intentions regarding the extent to which changes are needed and the organization's capacity to successfully make those changes" (armenakis, harris & Mossholder, 1993, pp. 282-283), and is considered a critical factor in ensuring that change initiatives are successful (chapman, 2002;chawla & Kelloway, 2004;smith, 2005a, 2005bWeber & Weber, 2001). …”
Section: Resistance To Change and Readiness For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key element is change in BPR, thus the attitudes of top managers and workers towards this change determine the fate of BPR. The premises of these attitudes are expectations from the change (Mossholder, Settoon, Armenakis, & Harris, 2000) and the coherence between these expectations and perceived results obtained (Smith, 2005). The fear that managers or workers have for the change should be directed before implementing BPR, thus positive attitudes should be developed (Lines, 2005) so that workers (Morris & Brandon, 1993) and managers (Amanquah & Adjei, 2013) can fully commit themselves.…”
Section: Business Process Reengineering (Bpr): Definitions and Importmentioning
confidence: 99%