Achieving organizational change: findings from case studies of 20 California healthy cities and communities coalitions

Abstract

As part of an evaluation of the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) Program, we assessed the extent to which coalitions implementing the healthy cities and communities model demonstrated capacity to leverage financial resources, expand programs and influence organizational policies. The evaluation design was a multiple case study of 20 participating communities with cross-case analysis. Participating communities spanned the state's diverse geographic regions and ranged from remote areas within rural counties to neighborhoods within large cities. Data included: semi-structured interviews with coordinators and community leaders, focus groups with coalition members and document review. Many CHCC coalitions were able to leverage significant financial resources across a diverse array of funding sources, including federal, state, county and city governments. In addition, all CHCC coalitions developed at least one new program, most commonly focused on youth development, civic capacity-building or lifelong learning. Changes in policies, reported by 19 of the 20 coalitions, were consistent with healthy cities and communities principles and were implemented in community-based organizations, county and city governments, and school districts. Typical changes included an increased willingness to collaborate, increased emphasis on engaging diverse parts of the community, greater responsiveness to community needs and more opportunities for resident input into decision-making. Our findings suggest the healthy cities and communities model has the potential to strengthen the organizational infrastructure of communities to promote health.

Health promotion at local level: a case study of content, organization and development in four Swedish municipalities

“…The view was expressed that this not only provided for efficiency and coordination gains, but also promoted public participation and influence. These enhancing factors, which facilitated action and implementation, and also increased participation and a sense of shared responsibility and ownership, have also been reported by Dressendorfer et al [30], Heward et al [31], Kegler et al [32], and Riley et al [33]. In their conceptual model of community capacity development, Dressendorfer et al [30] stress three facilitating factors to consider in the successful implementation and maintenance of health-promoting initiatives: well-functioning and engaging leadership, policy-making, and an existing operational infrastructure.…”

How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? a multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory

“…The original evaluation was designed to document the process of community development in 20 participating communities and assess changes that resulted from the local initiatives [31,32]. Participating communities were selected through a competitive process and were awarded a total of $125,000 over a three-year period; three distinct cohorts participated, beginning in 1998 and ending in 2003.…”

The importance of addressing social determinants of health at the local level: the case for social capital

“…2000). The original Healthy Cities model focuses on city government itself as the primary agent of change, but California’s adaptation of the program expanded this focus to include county governments and community‐based organisations, and has been effective in realising organisational change (Kegler et al. 2008a), strengthening community leadership (Kegler et al.…”