2014
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in Primary Care: Proposed Critical Processes from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN)

Abstract: Objective: The Kentucky Ambulatory Network, a practice-based research network, conducted this study to propose critical processes for electronic health record (EHR) implementation.Methods: Periodic observation of the implementation process and assessment of meaningful use (MU) metrics within 10 small primary care practices working with a regional extension center.Results: Through focus groups and structured interviews, the strategies, processes, and procedures used by these practices to achieve MU of EHRs were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies used electronic data extraction or reporting. [45][46][47]53,63 Electronic reporting includes the analysis of Meaningful Use attestation reports, which were required as of 2011 in the United States. Qualitative data collection methods, including in-person interviews (n ¼ 8), 22,33,37,52,55,56,60,61 and onsite observation (n ¼ 5), 33,37,41,52,55 were used less often.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five studies used electronic data extraction or reporting. [45][46][47]53,63 Electronic reporting includes the analysis of Meaningful Use attestation reports, which were required as of 2011 in the United States. Qualitative data collection methods, including in-person interviews (n ¼ 8), 22,33,37,52,55,56,60,61 and onsite observation (n ¼ 5), 33,37,41,52,55 were used less often.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies did not specify a setting, but included primary care physicians or practices in their analyses. Some specified a particular category of health organization, such as patientcentered medical homes (n ¼ 2), 31,46 small-to mediumsized practices (n ¼ 4), 33,40,45,56 and rural primary care practices (n ¼ 2). 22,54 The perspectives of the studies reviewed varied in whether they measured EHR use at the level of the practice/clinic (n ¼ 16) or at the level of the individual physician (n ¼ 15).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that teamwork, care coordination, and continuity are key elements for improving the quality and efficiency of primary care delivery, including CPS delivery ( 5 , 13 , 14 ). In recent years, several local health-care organizations [e.g., LAC Department of Health Services (DHS)] have moved toward a team care approach for delivery of these services.…”
Section: Program Model and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emphasis is placed on coordinating access to services across the broader health care system, making the experience more meaningful and efficient. Effective implementation of team care typically requires adoption and integration at multiple levels of the health care system, requiring support tools such as disease registries, electronic health records, decision support, provider reminder systems, and trainings to work in a team environment ( 4 , 13 ). In LAC, health organizations that serve priority populations are at initial stages of this system-level transformation.…”
Section: Program Model and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBRNs could further refine PRE-CIS to include these and other measures important for the bidirectional exchange between research and practice. 6 ) presents 8 themes, derived from qualitative research, of best practices for achieving "meaningful use" in primary care practices working with a regional extension center. These practical recommendations add to the rapidly growing evidence on effective EHR implementation.…”
Section: T2 Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%