2023
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202303169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving High‐Performance Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation on Ni(OH)2 with Optimized Intermediate Binding Energy Enabled by S‐Doping and CeO2‐Interfacing

Xiang Chen,
Xinyue Xu,
Yuwen Cheng
et al.

Abstract: The adsorption energy of the reaction intermediates has a crucial influence on the electrocatalytic activity. Ni‐based materials possess high oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance in alkaline, however too strong binding of *OH and high energy barrier of the rate‐determining step (RDS) severely limit their OER activity. Herein, a facile strategy is shown to fabricate novel vertical nanorod‐like arrays hybrid structure with the interface contact of S‐doped Ni(OH)2 and CeO2 in situ grown on Ni foam (S‐Ni(OH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reveal a prominent transition peak at 1.43 V ( vs. RHE) for the NiFeMo-LDH, which is lower than that of NiFe-LDH (1.53 V). 56 The potential that the phase angle peak occurs is in agreement with the OER onset potential of the LSV curves. 57 This also suggests faster reaction kinetics for water oxidation, indicating a pronounced reduction in charge transfer resistance for the NiFeMo-LDH catalysts compared to NiFe-LDH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reveal a prominent transition peak at 1.43 V ( vs. RHE) for the NiFeMo-LDH, which is lower than that of NiFe-LDH (1.53 V). 56 The potential that the phase angle peak occurs is in agreement with the OER onset potential of the LSV curves. 57 This also suggests faster reaction kinetics for water oxidation, indicating a pronounced reduction in charge transfer resistance for the NiFeMo-LDH catalysts compared to NiFe-LDH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…67,68 The current difference caused by the alcohol oxidation reaction can reveal the catalyst surface coverage of *OH, further indicating the adsorption of *OH. 69 The greater ethanol oxidation reaction current density of the NiFe-LDH catalyst suggests its stronger *OH adsorption than that of the NiFeMo-2 catalyst, indicating that the incorporation of Mo modulates the adsorption energy of *OH in NiFeMo-2, thus promoting the dehydrogenation process. The catalytic behaviour during the OER process was thoroughly investigated by in situ Raman spectroscopy, which can unravel the evolution of active species under various applied potentials and study the surface dynamic reconstruction process of the catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31,34 As displayed in Figure S1 To probe the effect of the crystal facets of oxygen-defective Co 3 O 4 on the OER kinetics, the Tafel slopes for all catalysts were obtained by a steady-state polarization technique to remove the impact of the rate of increase of electrode potential or polarization with the log of the current density. 40,41 As shown in Figures S7−S10 42,43 The intrinsic OER activities of the four samples were explored, and electrochemically active specific surface area (ECSA) was used to normalize their OER LSV plots. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at the non-Faradaic process potential range (Figure S11 This signifies that the (001) facet exhibits better stability as a promising OER electrocatalyst than the (111) facet for the oxygen-defective Co 3 O 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest angles for Vo-Cubic-Co 3 O 4 at each potential demonstrate that the electrochemical OER process involved more electrons than other catalysts.45−47 These results suggest that the (001)-faceted oxygen-defective Co 3 O 4 possesses superior electron transfer ability and OER kinetics compared to those of (111)-faceted oxygen-defective Co 3 O 4 .To further investigate the mechanism for the improved OER activity, the values of apparent activation energy (denoted as E app ) for the four catalysts were calculated on the basis of the temperature-dependent OER performance. The LSV curves of Cubic-Co 3 O 4 , Vo-Cubic-Co 3 O 4 , T-Oc-Co 3 O 4 , and Vo-T-Oc-Co 3 O 4 samples were measured at different temperatures(30,40,50,60, and 70 °C) as shown in FigureS19. It is expected that the OER performances of all the catalysts are enhanced with the increase of temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation