2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving high capacity and long life of aqueous rechargeable zinc battery by using nanoporous-carbon-supported poly(1,5-naphthalenediamine) nanorods as cathode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To highlight the merits of our designed Ni//Zn battery, its optimal energy and power densities were compared to those of previously reported aqueous energy storage devices in Figure 5 a. Specifically, a remarkable energy density of 4.29 mWh cm −2 (728 W h kg −1 ; based on the mass of active material in the cathode) overmatched the majority of recently reported Zn‐based batteries (Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information), such as Poly(1,5‐NAPD)/AC//Zn (3.2 mWh cm −2 at ≈0.41 mW cm −2 ), [ 53 ] MnO 2 //Zn (2.71 mWh cm −2 at 5.47 mW cm −2 ), [ 54 ] Ni@NiO//Zn (0.754 mWh cm −2 at 14.29 mW cm −2 ), [ 22 ] Ni,Zn–MgCo 2 O 4 //Zn (1.158 mWh cm −2 at 3.0 mW cm −2 ; 120.4 W h kg −1 at 0.312 KW kg −1 ), [ 55 ] P–NiCo 2 O 4‐ x //Zn (0.407 mWh cm −2 at 3.40 mW cm −2 ; 616.5 W h kg −1 at 5.15 KW kg −1 ), [ 16 ] CuV 2 O 6 //Zn (317 W h kg −1 at 0.21 KW kg −1 ), [ 8 ] and PANI/CF//Zn (389 W h kg −11 at ≈0.427 KW kg −1 ). [ 56 ] Encouragingly, its area power density of 52.5 mW cm −2 , even exceeded many recently reported state‐of‐the‐art ASCs (Table S3, Supporting Information), such as the S–α–Fe 2 O 3 @C//NaMnO 2 (22.0 mW cm −2 ), [ 57 ] g–C 3 N 4 //g–C 3 N 4 (12.5 mW cm −2 ), [ 58 ] NiCo‐LDH//AC (22.1 mW cm −2 ), [ 59 ] manifesting the rapid charge–discharge properties of the Ni//Zn battery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To highlight the merits of our designed Ni//Zn battery, its optimal energy and power densities were compared to those of previously reported aqueous energy storage devices in Figure 5 a. Specifically, a remarkable energy density of 4.29 mWh cm −2 (728 W h kg −1 ; based on the mass of active material in the cathode) overmatched the majority of recently reported Zn‐based batteries (Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information), such as Poly(1,5‐NAPD)/AC//Zn (3.2 mWh cm −2 at ≈0.41 mW cm −2 ), [ 53 ] MnO 2 //Zn (2.71 mWh cm −2 at 5.47 mW cm −2 ), [ 54 ] Ni@NiO//Zn (0.754 mWh cm −2 at 14.29 mW cm −2 ), [ 22 ] Ni,Zn–MgCo 2 O 4 //Zn (1.158 mWh cm −2 at 3.0 mW cm −2 ; 120.4 W h kg −1 at 0.312 KW kg −1 ), [ 55 ] P–NiCo 2 O 4‐ x //Zn (0.407 mWh cm −2 at 3.40 mW cm −2 ; 616.5 W h kg −1 at 5.15 KW kg −1 ), [ 16 ] CuV 2 O 6 //Zn (317 W h kg −1 at 0.21 KW kg −1 ), [ 8 ] and PANI/CF//Zn (389 W h kg −11 at ≈0.427 KW kg −1 ). [ 56 ] Encouragingly, its area power density of 52.5 mW cm −2 , even exceeded many recently reported state‐of‐the‐art ASCs (Table S3, Supporting Information), such as the S–α–Fe 2 O 3 @C//NaMnO 2 (22.0 mW cm −2 ), [ 57 ] g–C 3 N 4 //g–C 3 N 4 (12.5 mW cm −2 ), [ 58 ] NiCo‐LDH//AC (22.1 mW cm −2 ), [ 59 ] manifesting the rapid charge–discharge properties of the Ni//Zn battery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is to say that polymer molecules can remain highly redox activity and degrade the solubility in water simultaneously, which endows aqueous ZIBs with long cycle stability.Ast he polymer electrode materials of ZIBs,poly(1,5-naphthalenediamine) (poly(1,5-NAPD)) could display ah igh capacity retention of 91 %a fter 10 000 cycles at ac urrent density of 10 Ag À1 . [77] In addition to chain-like polymers,s mall organic compounds can be also assembled into covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with redox-active groups to act as the electrode materials of ZIBs. [78] COFs often possess high porosity and excellent chemical stability,w hich will be beneficial to fast ion diffusion and long cycle stability in ZIBs,r espectively.…”
Section: Strategies For Long Cyclel Ifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…morphology, while 2D materials mainly refer to the sheet like morphology. [196,[260][261][262][263] From the perspective of transport kinetics, although both of 1D and 2D materials have their own advantages, however, the limitation of 1D transport dimensions and self-stacking issue of 2D materials would inevitably weaken the reaction kinetics, especially for the thick electrode with high mass load. [78,[264][265] To beyond that, the construction of hierarchical 3D cathode materials with efficient transport kinetics is desirable, and their fabrication can be usually realized by either based on the rational combination of 0D and/or 1D and/or 2D materials, or directly using template methods.…”
Section: Other Dimensional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%