In 2015, 1.2 million individuals were estimated to be TB/HIV co-infected and 580 000 patients were affected by multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB (half of the global cases being in China, the Russian Federation and India), of whom, ∼125 000 were treated with a success rate <60%. Although about 49 million lives have been saved between 2000 and 2015 as a result of the enormous effort by WHO and its partners, much work is ahead us in the future if the United Nations Sustainable Development and End TB Strategy goals are to be reached.The present prevalence of resistance to the available anti-TB drugs plays a crucial role in fighting the MDR-TB epidemic. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis by Dick Menzies and colleagues, published in the recent past, demonstrated that cases harbouring Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with an extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB profile (i.e. resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, any fluoroquinolones, and at least one of the second-line injectable drugs, amikacin, capreomycin and kanamycin) or with resistance patterns beyond XDR achieve a suboptimal treatment success rate (40% and 20%, respectively) [6][7][8]. Given the difficulty of ensuring, in these severe cases, the minimum number of anti-TB drugs recommended by WHO to design an effective regimen, important discussions are presently taking place on both new and repurposed drugs [9,10].The article by FOX et al. [11] in this issue of the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) highlights the role of the anti-TB drugs belonging to the (so-called) Group 5; at the time, the 2011 MDR-TB guidelines were still in force. In May of this year, in fact, new WHO guidelines were released, which modified the grouping of second-line anti-TB drugs [12,13]. FOX et al. [11] focuses on the so-called repurposed drugs, such as the antibiotics approved for infections other than TB (e.g. linezolid, carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem), terizidone, thioacetazone,