Achieving Demand-Side Synergy from Strategic Diversification: How Combining Mundane Assets Can Leverage Consumer Utilities

Abstract

We explore the overlooked issue of how certain strategic-level, interindustry diversification options might increase consumer utility. Discussions of inter-industry diversification typically focus on producer synergies obtainable from economies of scope or from skill transfer across business units. Discussions of intra-industry product diversification—generally, the province of marketing—typically focus on synergies obtainable from product bundling, which lowers producer costs or provides convenience for consumers. We take a different tack by linking interindustry diversification and consumer utility. We first separately examine two possible consumer benefits of interindustry diversification: (1) facilitating consumers' accomplishment of two tasks simultaneously or (2) attracting diverse consumer groups to a common platform when intergroup externalities exist. We then assess a simple empirical context that shows potential for simultaneous consumer utilities and two-sided market utility together. We analyze this context and concurrently develop a mathematical model showing how these demand-side synergies can create unique business value. We next introduce asymmetric preferences among consumer subgroups, and we refine our arguments by comparing their conclusions with the empirical data. We learn that combinations of otherwise mundane (i.e., commonplace) assets can create consumer value—“superior” assets are not necessary. Moreover, common ownership is necessary for the pricing flexibility required to deliver (and capture) maximum value through interindustry diversification, especially when consumer groups' preferences may change; the negotiations and settling up required for cooperation through alliances will, without common ownership, increase costs and reduce responsiveness. We discuss the sustainability of demand-side advantages and the implications of these ideas for future research and practice.

Organizational Constraints to Adaptation: Intrafirm Asymmetry in the Locus of Coordination

“…To answer this question, it may be helpful to start by understanding the nature of the change itself. Although we know quite a bit about the implications of technology-driven change, with a large body of prior work examining such "supplyside" technology shifts Anderson 1986, Henderson andClark 1990), the role of the "demand side" has only relatively recently begun to be addressed (Adner and Levinthal 2001, Chatterji and Fabrizio 2012, Ye et al 2012. Recognizing that demand-side change can be a frequent and common source of environmental turbulence, Tripsas (2008) introduces the idea of "customer preference discontinuities," which represent rapid and significant change in the attributes over which customers make purchase decisions.…”

Product and Marketing Actions in a Competitive Scenario

“…Whereas in markets characterized by demand synergies firms offering a variety of products under similar brands would benefit from "one-stop shopping" effects, thus capturing more customers with higher willingness to pay (Fosfuri & Giarratana, 2007;Siggelkow, 2003;Ye, Priem, & Alshwer, 2012), in the context of this research -where scope economies from demand are irrelevant -we can hypothesize the following:…”

Integrated low-carbon distribution system for the demand side of a product distribution supply chain: a DoE-guided MOPSO optimiser-based solution approach

“…In a supply chain, consumers are regarded as the purchasers of the chain's end product. This side of the SC has consumer centric strategies for value creation (Adner and Snow 2010;Ye et al 2012). Product flow in a food value-chain plays a crucial role on its performance for the management and control of the demand side of the SC (Taylor 2006).…”