2020
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration

Abstract: High costs of tree planting are a barrier to meeting global forest restoration targets. Natural forest regeneration is more cost‐effective than tree planting, but its potential to foster restoration at scale is poorly understood. We predict, map, and quantify natural regeneration potential within 75.5 M ha of deforested lands in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Of 34.1 M ha (26.4%) of current forest cover, 2.7 M ha (8.0%) regenerated naturally from 1996 to 2015. We estimate that another 2.8 M ha could naturally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
134
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
134
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…At a landscape scale, naturally regenerating forests can cost-effectively contribute to the conservation and restoration of biodiversity through the creation of buffer zones, establishment of biological corridors and stepping stones in an agricultural matrix, and recovery of disturbed areas within protected areas (Guevara et al 2005, Evans et al 2017, Newmark et al 2017. Forest fragmentation could be reduced by 44% in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest if the 210 000 km 2 of land with a high capacity for spontaneous and assisted natural regeneration were left to recover (Crouzeilles et al 2020). In temperate agricultural southern Australia, shelterbelts composed of natural regeneration can act as critical habitats for a range of native biota while protecting crops from wind and storm damage and reducing erosion .…”
Section: Search Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At a landscape scale, naturally regenerating forests can cost-effectively contribute to the conservation and restoration of biodiversity through the creation of buffer zones, establishment of biological corridors and stepping stones in an agricultural matrix, and recovery of disturbed areas within protected areas (Guevara et al 2005, Evans et al 2017, Newmark et al 2017. Forest fragmentation could be reduced by 44% in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest if the 210 000 km 2 of land with a high capacity for spontaneous and assisted natural regeneration were left to recover (Crouzeilles et al 2020). In temperate agricultural southern Australia, shelterbelts composed of natural regeneration can act as critical habitats for a range of native biota while protecting crops from wind and storm damage and reducing erosion .…”
Section: Search Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Minas Gerais State, Brazil, Nunes et al (2017) projected that spontaneous and assisted natural regeneration could effectively restore 15 000 km 2 of forest over 20 years. Across the entire Atlantic Forest region of Brazil, 210 000 km 2 of degraded lands can potentially be restored through assisted natural regeneration, reducing implementation costs by US$ 90.6 billion (77%) compared to active restoration methods (Crouzeilles et al 2020).…”
Section: Economic Benefits Of Naturally Regenerating Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations