Achieving compliance in chronic illness management: illustrations of trust relationships between physicians and nutrition clinic patients

Abstract

This paper presents empirical research from a study of trust and co-operation between chronic illness patients and their physicians, conducted in nutrition clinics. The paper details models of trust and co-operative behaviour designed to aid interpretive analysis. The paper then presents an interpretive discussion of 16 examples from interactions observed between patients and their consultants at the initial visit and revisit stage of the illness management process in consecutive clinics. This illustrates some of the ways interpersonal trust development between patients and their physicians may affect health care delivery. The paper finds physicians appear to make in-clinic opportunities for building resilient trust relations with patients based on common understanding and experience, engendering more rapid patient compliance. This is further promoted by a contemporaneous positive focus on key issues, such as patient-perceived importance and patient-perceived self-competence, serving to lower patient co-operation thresholds. In the best instances, the combined effect is significant patient empowerment, and thus improved health care delivery as a result of the compliance thereby achieved. In addition, it is suggested the speed of trust development during the interactions is not commensurate with long term relationship sustainability, and suggests this as an explanation for, amongst others, failure to attend rates.

Trust in Physician Scale: Factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates of trust in a sample of Nigerian psychiatric outpatients

“…It is also crucial to patient readiness to seek healthcare, divulge sensitive information and adhere to physicians' advice (Hall et al, 2001). Studies have explored the influence of trust on the patient-physician relationship in terms of modulating different aspects of the therapeutic processes such as the willingness of health care seekers to endorse the physician's recommended treatment has been reported to be associated with statistically significantly higher level of trust (Collins et al, 2002;Dibben and Lena, 2002). Different authors have also reported positive associations between trust and treatment adherence (Joos et al, 1996;Thom et al, 2002).…”

Trust matters for doctors? Towards an agenda for research

“…Trust has been recognised as particularly significant for effective healthcare provision across many national systems and provider contexts (Mechanic, 2001;Dibben and Lena, 2003;van der Schee et al, 2007) and moreover as incorporating a number of different dimensions such as macro-level policies, inter-professional cooperation and professional/patient communication (Calnan and Sanford, 2004). Trust relations are significant in shaping and facilitating interactions and transactions between patients and professionals (see Mechanic and Meyer, 2000), but, as a limited amount of research has highlighted, also amongst doctors and between healthcare professionals and managers (Gilson et al 2005;Brown et al 2011).…”

Trust and trust relations from the providers’ perspective: the case of the healthcare system in India

“…Trust is recognised as significant for providing effective healthcare across national systems and provider contexts (13,14,15). Rowe and Calnan (16) contend that "the cost of failing to recognise the importance of trust and to address the changing nature of trust relations could be substantial: economically, politically, and most important of all, in terms of health outcomes" (p.6).…”