1991
DOI: 10.1080/03637759109376231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving communication goals in superior‐subordinate relationships: The multi‐functionality of upward maintenance tactics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
131
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, leaders have both in-group and out-group relationships with their employees. In-group, high quality relationships are characterized by high levels of information communication, mutual support, informal influence, and trust whereas out-group, low quality ones have formal supervision, little support, and mistrust (Fairhurst, 1993;Green & Fairhurst, 1986, 1989Krone, 1992;Lee & Jablin, 1995;Waldron, 1991). The more that managers and employees develop a high quality work relationship and interact, the more likely that employees perform effectively.…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a consequence, leaders have both in-group and out-group relationships with their employees. In-group, high quality relationships are characterized by high levels of information communication, mutual support, informal influence, and trust whereas out-group, low quality ones have formal supervision, little support, and mistrust (Fairhurst, 1993;Green & Fairhurst, 1986, 1989Krone, 1992;Lee & Jablin, 1995;Waldron, 1991). The more that managers and employees develop a high quality work relationship and interact, the more likely that employees perform effectively.…”
Section: Leader-member Exchangementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Stimulated by the early work of Ayres (1983) and Shea and Pearson (1986) using imagined relational scenarios, more current research reflects many interests and theories. There are typologies of proand antisocial maintenance behaviors (Baxter & Dindia, 1990;Dindia & Baxter, 1987), studies ranging from affinity-seeking strategies in marriage (Bell, Daly, & Gonzalez, 1987) to superior-subordinate communication on the job (Waldron, 1991), and a taxonomy/measuring instrument (Canary & Stafford, 1992;Stafford & Canary, 1991). Theoretical perspectives include dialectics (Baxter, 1990;Baxter & Simon, 1993;Dindia & Baxter, 1987;Montgomery, 1993), equity theory (Canary & Stafford, 1992;Canary & Stafford, 1993), interdependence theory (Rusbult & Buunk, 1993), and the rules approach (Honeycutt, Woods, & Fontenot, 1993).…”
Section: Relational Maintenance Gendered Communicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This includes work on dyadic role-making processes (Graen, Orris, & Johnson, 1973;Haga, 1976;Graen, Novak, & Sommerkamp, 1982;Seers & Graen, 1984;Snyder & Bruning, 1985;Zalesny & Graen, 1987;Graen & Scandura, 1987;Graen, 1989;McClane, 1991b), investigations of communication frequency (Schiemann & Graen, 1984;Baker & Ganster, 1985;Borchgrevink & Donohue, 1991), investigations of interactive communication patterns relative to LMX (Fairhurst & Chandler, 1989;Fairhurst, 1993), and leader-member value agreement (Graen & Schiemann, 1978;Kozlowski & Doherty, 1989;Ashkanasy & O'Connor, 1994). In addition, this category includes research on antecedents to and/or determinants of LMX Larwood & Blackmore, 1978;Kim & Organ, 1982;Duchon, Green, & Taber, 1986;Steiner, 1988;Heneman, Greenberger, & Anonyuo, 1989;Liden, Wayne, & Stilwell, 1993;Vasudevan, 1993), upward maintenance tactics and interaction patterns used by followers in high LMX relationships (Waldron, 1991), subordinate loyalty (Scandura & Graen, 1984), decision influence , influence tactics (Wayne & Ferris, 1990;Dockery & Steiner, 1990;Deluga & Perry, 1991), and member affect about the relationship (Liden, 1985;McClane, 1991a;Day & Crain, 1992). Moreover, studies investigating characteristics of followers in high LMX relationships identified them as high growth-need strength …”
Section: Stage 2: Focus On the Relationship And Its Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%