2016
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Balance with the AMCPFormat for Formulary Submissions, Version 4.0: A Dossier Producer’s Perspective

Abstract: Both authors are employed by Xcenda and develop AMCP Format dossiers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For guidance on modeling economic outcomes, it made reference to ISPOR's best practice guidance for costeffectiveness and budget impact models. [17][18][19][20][21] The most recent version, Version 4.1, provides guidance for the communication of information about unapproved products and indications in the form of pre-approval dossiers in response to the 21st Century Cures Act and the FDA Final Guidance on industry communications with payers. [22][23][24]…”
Section: ■■ the Regence Guidelines Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For guidance on modeling economic outcomes, it made reference to ISPOR's best practice guidance for costeffectiveness and budget impact models. [17][18][19][20][21] The most recent version, Version 4.1, provides guidance for the communication of information about unapproved products and indications in the form of pre-approval dossiers in response to the 21st Century Cures Act and the FDA Final Guidance on industry communications with payers. [22][23][24]…”
Section: ■■ the Regence Guidelines Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%