2006
DOI: 10.1108/17410380610707393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving agility in supply chain through simultaneous “design of” and “design for” supply chain

Abstract: PurposeThe two main constituting elements of the supply chains are “product” and “supply chain operations”, which are highly inter‐related across more than one dimension. Many of the drawbacks in the success and sustainability of supply chains often relate to the segregation of these dimensions. This paper seeks to examine the ideas and to propose an integrated approach to facilitate the dynamic and simultaneous design and development of products and supply chains, thus contributing to the notion of agile supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on dynamic capability theory, this research considers the role of MO, MC, AC, and their complementary effect to account NPP. Firms currently operate in a highly turbulent environment; therefore, future study may investigate the role of potential organizational strategic capabilities such as agility (Sharifi et al, 2006) and its combination with other organizational orientation (i.e., MO and supply chain orientation) and capabilities and resources (i.e., MO and AC) in this context. In the same vein, the effects of environmental turbulence factors (market, competition, and technology turbulence) on the process of deploying MO, MC, and their interaction could provide further insight in the subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on dynamic capability theory, this research considers the role of MO, MC, AC, and their complementary effect to account NPP. Firms currently operate in a highly turbulent environment; therefore, future study may investigate the role of potential organizational strategic capabilities such as agility (Sharifi et al, 2006) and its combination with other organizational orientation (i.e., MO and supply chain orientation) and capabilities and resources (i.e., MO and AC) in this context. In the same vein, the effects of environmental turbulence factors (market, competition, and technology turbulence) on the process of deploying MO, MC, and their interaction could provide further insight in the subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conventional approach to NPD has in recent years been questioned, since it is a costly and time-consuming approach due to its iterative nature (Sharifi et al, 2006). It is argued that the TTM and the cost of NPD can be reduced considerably by involving the support functions to a greater extent, and also earlier in the NPD process (Carillo and Franza, 2006;Van Hoek and Chapman, 2006).…”
Section: Coordination Of Npd and Scmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When concentrating on the strategic phase of supply chain management (SCM), the selection of the appropriate supply chain strategy is crucial to achieve a fit with the supply chain's risks. Supply chain strategies such as agility (Ramesh and Devadasan, 2007;Sharifi et al, 2006;Yauch, 2011), robustness (Meepetchdee and Shah, 2007;Stonebraker et al, 2009), and resilience (Ponomarov and Holcomb, 2009;Sheffi, 2005) have previously been discussed in the realm of manufacturing and SCM. The main purpose of this paper is to propose a model that enables a company to select the supply chain strategy based on the risk dimensions of "probability" and "impact".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%