2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-010-0387-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievements of the Earth orientation parameters prediction comparison campaign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the mean l of CV errors is l CV ffi 0, andr MAE for an n element set with standard deviation r CV can be calculated with the formula (Kalarus et al 2010; Eq. 8):…”
Section: Statistical and Spatial Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the mean l of CV errors is l CV ffi 0, andr MAE for an n element set with standard deviation r CV can be calculated with the formula (Kalarus et al 2010; Eq. 8):…”
Section: Statistical and Spatial Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecast accuracy of the nutation-precession corrections dψ , dε for 1-year in the future is of the order of their observational error, which is of the order of 100ȝas, because the current IAU2000/IAU2006 nutation-precession model fits very well to the observations (Kalarus et al, 2010). Nevertheless, p x , p y pole coordinates and in particular UT1-UTC vary rapidly and are unpredictable in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, determinations and forecasts of the three parameters are an ongoing challenge. Usually, the prediction accuracy of the three parameters even for a few days in the future are much worse than their observational accuracy, which now corresponds to 50-100ȝas in the case of p x , p y pole coordinates and 5-10ȝs in the case of UT1-UTC (Kalarus et al, 2010). Among these five EOPs, the UT1-UTC or its first derivative, length of day (LOD), which represents the variations of the Earth's rotation rate, is the most difficult to forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A list of participants who supported the LOD predictions can be found in Kalarus et al (2010). What can be said with the information available from the comparison is that the accuracy of ultra short-term predictions by the GPR is inferior to the prediction accuracy of the number one (Gross et al (1998)) and the number two (Kalarus et al (2010)). For short-term predictions an accuracy is obtained which is inferior to the best presently available prediction method developed by Gross et al (1998).…”
Section: Y U L E I a N D O T H E R S Vol 68mentioning
confidence: 99%