Handbook of Psychological Assessment 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043645-6/50085-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievement Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study had several strengths, including the high retention rate with only 16 participants (9%) withdrawing from the longitudinal study between age 3 and age 8, repeated measurement of SDB symptoms to describe the SDB trajectories of children over time to help elucidate symptom profiles, and the assessment of important academic skills at age 8. Individually-administered assessments of academic skills assessments used here provide more sensitive and specific information than broad indices of achievement (Katz and Slomka, 2000 ) and cover key areas of reading, math and listening comprehension to give a deeper understanding of performance in these specific skills. Although these assessments may not reflect day-to-day classroom performance when distractions are present, they complement other methods such as traditional achievement measures (e.g., reading comprehension) and real-world data (e.g., teacher ratings) in describing children's academic progress (Kettler and Albers, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study had several strengths, including the high retention rate with only 16 participants (9%) withdrawing from the longitudinal study between age 3 and age 8, repeated measurement of SDB symptoms to describe the SDB trajectories of children over time to help elucidate symptom profiles, and the assessment of important academic skills at age 8. Individually-administered assessments of academic skills assessments used here provide more sensitive and specific information than broad indices of achievement (Katz and Slomka, 2000 ) and cover key areas of reading, math and listening comprehension to give a deeper understanding of performance in these specific skills. Although these assessments may not reflect day-to-day classroom performance when distractions are present, they complement other methods such as traditional achievement measures (e.g., reading comprehension) and real-world data (e.g., teacher ratings) in describing children's academic progress (Kettler and Albers, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance-based assessment, also called authentic assessment, is a testing method that includes a problem-solving process (Katz & Slomka, 2000; Messick, 1994; Torrance, 1995). It requires students to complete a task (such as creating a product or answering a question) on the assumption that specific, measurable attributes can be extracted from the outcome of the task to evaluate the extent of students’ learning toward the expected skill or knowledge (Gresse Von Wangenheim et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2002; Salma & Prastikawati, 2021; Xing et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achievement tests are used to measure skills and knowledge learned in a given task or grade level through planned instruction; they have generally been categorized as singlesubject tests, survey batteries, or diagnostic tests and further dichotomized as group or individually administered tests given in order to obtain an indication of general academic skill competencies or a greater understanding of an individual's achievement in a particular area of academic performance (Katz & Slomka, 2000).The average percentage of each cluster forms students' art learning achievement which was used to determine the competence level of the art teachers.…”
Section: Test Of Art Teachers' Operational Competence Based On Practi...mentioning
confidence: 99%